Google

Welcome to my blog

Houston Filmmakers and Actors

Monday, January 31, 2005

Bohemian New York - The golden age of bohemia. By Inigo Thomas



Bohemian New York

From: Inigo Thomas
Subject: The Arrival of a Bohemian
Monday, Jan. 31, 2005, at 11:38 AM PT

There's no bohemia in today's New York. Nothing resembles Greenwich Village in its various incarnations from the turn of the 20th century to the 1960s, or the art-scene East Village of the late 1970s and 1980s, or Williamsburg in the early 1990s. You can try to find bohemia in far-away Bushwick or Red Hook, both districts of Brooklyn. You can go over the Hudson to the disused warehouses of Jersey City; to Harlem; or even across the harbor to Staten Island, where, in the 1950s, in a house near the ferry terminal, the bohemian critic and Henry James scholar Marius Bewley threw legendary weekendlong parties at which he sometimes dressed as a cardinal, so legendary that I heard about these gatherings across the ocean, in London, 40 years on. But you don't come to find such a place, do you? You come to live the life.

Bohemia doesn't exist as a place. There's no point chasing after it. The bars, saloons, and clubs where bohemians once congregated—the Cedar Tavern on University Place (where the Abstract Expressionist painters met), Cafe Reggio on McDougal Street (a hang-out for the Beat poets, for Allen Ginsberg and Jack Kerouac), CBGB on the Bowery (the punk bohemian metropolis of the '70s and early '80s)—aren't bohemian in any sense. Today, the clientele at these places are likely to be students or tourists.

That's not to say there aren't bohemians in the city. There are, but they choose not to live among each other, in a village or a quarter, where they would drive themselves, and those around them, near-mad; bohemians in group invariably do. Christine Stansell's entertaining American Moderns, a history of Greenwich Village bohemia from 1900 to 1920, chronicles the lives of a group of bohemian self-dramatists—Mable Dodge, John Reed, Max Eastman, and many others—who went about making their names often by torturing friends with their arguing and affairs. Whenever bohemians are together, they're likely to be indifferent to the feelings of others. They argue and coerce one another, though their arguing and coercing are sometimes distinguishable from their indifference to other people. Gary Indiana, who lived the East Village bohemia of the 1980s, says that after you've lived in New York for a time you end up liking the people you loathed. I might add that once you start liking those you hated, you're through with bohemianism.

Bohemians aren't necessarily preoccupied by artistic endeavors—or the doing or the making of anything. Not all artists are bohemian, though bohemians invariably live as if their lives were art. They live by love affairs and passions, art by other means, and, when affairs go wrong or passions fade, they nurse the maximum regret—the dramatic falling out, the theatrical breaking-up—with red wine or drugs or wanderings, the serious gloom a necessary counterweight to all the overexuberance.

In my experience, when a bohemian-minded friend arrives in New York, the entire city has tended to assume a more bohemian character: Bohemians are intensely influential, forever altering their immediate surroundings. They're always visitors, whether they live here or not, always unsettled. They're without ordinary troubles. They're out of touch with the life that's considered real. They're more anachronistic than alienated. They're hopeless, yet mysteriously capable of getting by without anyone knowing how they do so. They're people of impossibly modest means who nevertheless live often life more richly or vividly than anyone else. They're irregular in every habit and instinct save one—an irrepressible urge to move, against what appears to be their best interests, whenever they feel too comfortable. They shift from high life to low life and vice versa. One day they convince themselves they are tortured by love; the next they express their conviction that nothing is more enduring. Everything in their lives is animated by intensely felt subjective experience.

With a true bohemian, there's never a chance of assimilation; life is a condition of permanent resistance to belonging (to place, to family, anything resembling a home), though I've always believed they tend to be at their best in New York. It's a good city for émigrés, for those passing through, for the strays and the wayward, the people permanently estranged from home—until New York appears unbearably homely and domesticated, as it can when seen from certain angles.

Many New Yorkers complain that New York is not what it was—back in the 1970s or the 1950s, or in the Gilded Age. But that's because they are, or have become, New Yorkers, and it's a condition of belonging to complain. For those who don't belong, and in an era when border controls are fiercer than ever, when you're forced to belong perhaps more than you'd like, it's the bohemian's achievement (if they have no other) that they don't appear to belong anywhere.

Recently, I went to visit a bohemian friend, who had recently arrived in New York. He was at the Chelsea, the hotel famous less for its comfort—there's no room service, for example—than for those who have stayed in its beds, or who sometimes died en suite. It's where Sid Vicious killed Nancy Spungen, and from its front door Dylan Thomas walked out into a day and did not return. My friend was staying with friends who'd also recently arrived from London. (I've done the same myself, this staying with friends from out-of-town, in nomadic phases, and there have been several in my New York existence, months when I've not lived anywhere.) He occupied the sofa in the main room of a surprisingly elegant and recently restored set of rooms, so very out of character with rest of this legendarily shabby-chic hotel—the pleasantly seedy corridors, the dust in the lobby, the reassuring disorder at the front desk and the jaded spontaneity of those who work behind it. The artwork in hallways and stairwells, which once looked fresh to some, vibrantly colorful in an '80s way, is now catastrophically inert, speaking to no one, except, maybe, to some of the hotel's lifers—the people who live at the Chelsea, among them a few surviving Chelsea Girls of the Andy Warhol era.

You either like this sort of atmosphere or you don't, and the Chelsea is more expensive than it was—close to 200 bucks a night, including tax. You might prefer the Harlem Flop House, a brownstone with just four rooms on 122nd St., which is popular with a curator from Tate Britain, and close to Harlem jazz clubs such as The Lenox Lounge, Lucy's, Perk's, and Showmans, not far also from the white-stone tomb of Ulysses S. Grant on 123rd Street and Riverside Drive. In the summer, weekly jazz concerts are performed on the plaza in front of the Grant mausoleum, and on warm, clear, humid nights, when the fireflies are sparking, the light fading to the west over the Hudson, few experiences are as haunting and as beautiful as an open air jazz concert performed in front of the memorial to an American president and general who fought against slavery and for the preservation of the Union. There are jazz aficionados, many of them seated in folding jazz chairs, at their jazz picnics; others are dancing; the rest stand staring at the musicians (you can buy a picnic from the nearby Fairway Market on the river and 135th Street). These concerts aren't New York occasions, however, they're an American experience, in which you are thrown into the history of a continent and into the history of those Americans whose music is an expression of their experience of suffering and their triumph over the worst of it.

Inigo Thomas lives in New York, though from time to time he considers living elsewhere. He is a journalist, an editor, and has worked for Slate, George, and the London Review of Books. He has an enthusiasm for voyages of exploration and for 18th-century natural science.

Article URL: http://slate.msn.com/id/2112812/

Jokes sent from my friend Cheryl

What is the difference between a Harley and a Hoover?
The position of the dirt bag.

Why is divorce so expensive?
Because it's worth it.

Why is Chelsea Clinton so homely?
Because Janet Reno is her real father.

What do you call a smart blonde?
A golden retriever.

What do attorneys use for birth control?
Their personalities.

What's the difference between a girlfriend and wife?
45 lbs.

What's the difference between a boyfriend and husband?
45 minutes.

What's the fastest way to a man's heart?
Through his chest with a sharp knife.

Why do men want to marry virgins?
They can't stand criticism.

Why is it so hard for women to find men that are sensitive, caring, and good-looking?
Because those men already have boyfriends.

What's the difference between a new husband and a new dog?
After a year, the dog is still excited to see you.

What makes men chase women they have no intention of marrying?
The same urge that makes dogs chase cars they have no intention of driving.


A brunette, a blonde, and a redhead are all in third grade.
Who has the biggest boobs?
The blonde, because she's 18.

Why don't bunnies make noise when they have sex?
Because they have cotton balls.

What's the difference between a porcupine and BMW?
A porcupine has the pricks on the outside.

What did the blonde say when she found out she was pregnant?
"Are you sure it's mine?"

What's the difference between Beer Nut s and Deer Nuts?
Beer Nuts are $1, and Deer Nuts are always under a buck.

Why do men find it difficult to make eye contact?
Breasts don't have eyes.

Did you hear about the dyslexic Rabbi?
He walks around saying "Yo."

Why do drivers' education classes in Redneck schools use the car only on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays?
Because on Tuesday and Thursday, the Sex Ed class uses it.

What's the Cuban National Anthem?
"Row, Row, Row Your Boat"

Where does an Irish family go on vacation?
A different bar.

What would you call it when an Italian has one arm shorter than the other?
A speech impediment.

What does it mean when the flag at the Post Office is flying at half-mast?
They're hiring.

What's the difference between a southern zoo and a northern zoo?
A southern zoo has a description of the animal on the front of the cage along with... "a recipe."

How do you get a sweet little 80-year-old lady to say the F... word?
Get another sweet little 80-year-old lady to yell *BINGO*!

What's the difference between a northern fairytale and a southern fairytale?
A Northern fairytale begins "Once upon a time..."
A southern fairytale begins "Y'all ain't gonna believe this shit..."

Why is there no Disneyland in China?
No one's tall enough to go on

Sunday, January 30, 2005

Oklahoma Wine News

Frank Rich: Forget Armor. All You Need Is Love



January 30, 2005
FRANK RICH
Forget Armor. All You Need Is Love

JAN. 30 is here at last, and the light is at the end of the tunnel, again. By my estimate, Iraq's election day is the fifth time that American troops have been almost on their way home from an about-to-be pacified Iraq. The four other incipient V-I days were the liberation of Baghdad (April 9, 2003), President Bush's declaration that "major combat operations have ended" (May 1, 2003), the arrest of Saddam Hussein (Dec. 14, 2003) and the handover of sovereignty to our puppet of choice, Ayad Allawi (June 28, 2004). And this isn't even counting the two "decisive" battles for our nouveau Tet, Falluja. Iraq is Vietnam on speed - the false endings of that tragic decade re-enacted and compressed in jump cuts, a quagmire retooled for the MTV attention span.

But in at least one way we are not back in Vietnam. Iraq hawks, like Vietnam hawks before them, often take the line that to criticize America's mission in Iraq is to attack the troops. That paradigm just doesn't hold. Americans, including those opposed to the war, love the troops (Lynndie England always excepted). Not even the most unhinged Bush hater is calling our all-volunteer army "baby killers." This time, paradoxically enough, it is often those who claim to love the troops the most - and who have the political power to help alleviate their sacrifice - who turn out to be the troops' false friends.

There was, for instance, according to the Los Angeles Times, "nary a mention" of the Iraq war or "the prices paid by American soldiers and their families" at the lavish Inauguration bash thrown for the grandees of the Christian right by the Rev. Lou Sheldon of the Traditional Values Coalition at Washington's Ritz-Carlton. This crowd cares about the troops much the way the Fifth Avenue swells in the 1936 Hollywood classic "My Man Godfrey" cared about the "forgotten men" of the Depression - as fashion ornaments and rhetorical conveniences. In that screwball comedy, a socialite on a scavenger hunt collects a genuine squatter from the shantytown along the East River. "All you have to do is go to the Waldorf-Ritz Hotel with me," she tells her recruit, "and I'll show you to a few people and then I'll send you right back."

In this same vein, television's ceremonial coverage of the Inauguration, much of which resembled the martial pageantry broadcast by state-owned networks in banana republics, made a dutiful show out of the White House's claim that the four-day bacchanal was a salute to the troops. The only commentator to rudely call attention to the disconnect between that fictional pretense and the reality was Judy Bachrach, a writer for Vanity Fair, who dared say on Fox News that the inaugural's military ball and prayer service would not keep troops "safe and warm" in their "flimsy" Humvees in Iraq. She was promptly given the hook. (The riveting three-minute clip, labeled "Fair and Balanced Inauguration," can be found at ifilm.com, where it has seized the "most popular" slot once owned by Jon Stewart's slapdown of Tucker Carlson.)

Alas, there were no Fox News cameras to capture what may have been the week's most surreal "salute" to the troops, the "Heroes Red, White and Blue Inaugural Ball" attended by Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz. The event's celebrity stars included the Fox correspondent Geraldo Rivera, who had been booted from Iraq at the start of the war for compromising "operational security" by telling his viewers the position of the American troops he loves so much. He joked to the crowd that his deployment as an "overpaid" reporter was tantamount to that of an "underpaid hero" in battle. The attendees from Walter Reed and Bethesda Naval Hospital, some of whose long-term care must be picked up by private foundations because of government stinginess, responded with "deafening silence," reported Roxanne Roberts of The Washington Post. Ms. Roberts understandably left the party after the night's big act: Nile Rodgers and Chic sang the lyrics "Clap your hands, hoo!" and "Dance to the beat" to "a group of soldiers missing hands and legs."

All the TV time eaten up by the Inaugural froufrou - including "the most boring parade in America," as one network news producer covering it described it to me - would have been better spent broadcasting a true tribute to the American troops in Iraq: a new documentary titled "Gunner Palace." This movie, which opens in theaters March 4, is currently on an advance tour through towns near military bases like Colorado Springs, Colo. (Fort Carson), Killeen, Tex. (Fort Hood) and Columbus, Ga. (Fort Benning). Its directors, Michael Tucker and Petra Epperlein, found that American troops in Iraq often see their lives as real-life approximations of "M*A*S*H," "Platoon," "Full Metal Jacket," and, given the many 21st-century teenagers among the troops, " 'Jackass' Goes to War." But their film's tone is original. This sweet yet utterly unsentimental movie synthesizes the contradictions of a war that is at once Vietnam redux and the un-Vietnam.

Watching "Gunner Palace" - the title refers to the 2-3 Field Artillery's headquarters, the gutted former Uday Hussein palace in Baghdad - you realize the American mission is probably doomed even as you admire the men and women who volunteered to execute it. Here, at last, are the promised scenes of our troops pursuing a humanitarian agenda. Delighted kids follow the soldiers like pied pipers; schools re-open; a fledgling local government council receives a genial and unobtrusive helping American hand. In one moving scene, Specialist James Moats tenderly cradles a tiny baby at an Iraqi orphanage while talking about the birth of his own first son back home: "I've seen pictures but I haven't got to hold him yet." He's not complaining, just explaining. He is living in the moment, offering his heart fully to the vulnerable infant in the crook of his arm.

These scenes are set against others in which the troops, many of them from small towns "that read like an atlas of forgotten America," have to make do with substandard support from their own government. "It'll probably slow down the shrapnel so that it stays in your body instead of going straight through," says one soldier as he tries to find humor in the frail scrap metal with which he must armor his vehicle. Eventually many of his peers, however proud to serve, are daunted by what they see around them: the futility of snuffing out a growing insurgency, the fecklessness of the Iraqi troops they earnestly try to train, the impracticality of bestowing democracy on a populace that often regards Americans either indifferently or as occupiers. When "The Ride of the Valkyries" is heard in "Gunner Palace," it does not signal a rip-roaring campaign as it did in "Apocalypse Now" but, fittingly for this war, a perilous but often fruitless door-to-door search for insurgents in an urban neighborhood.

It says much about the distance between the homefront and these troops that the Motion Picture Association of America this month blithely awarded "Gunner Palace" an "R" rating - which means that it cannot be seen without parental supervision by 16-year-old high-school kids soon to be targeted by military recruiters. (The filmmakers are appealing this verdict.) The reason for the "R" is not violence - there is virtually none on screen - but language, since some of the troops chronicle their Iraq experience by transposing it into occasionally scatological hip-hop verse.

The Bush administration's National Endowment for the Arts, eager to demonstrate that it, too, loves the troops, announced with much self-congratulatory fanfare that it will publish its own anthology of returning veterans' writings about their wartime experience ("Operation Homecoming") - by spring 2006. In "Gunner Palace," you can sample this art right now, unexpurgated - if you're over 16. Here's one freestyle lyric from Sgt. Nick Moncrief, a 24-year-old father of two: "I noticed that my face is aging so quickly/ Cuz I've seen more than your average man in his 50's." True, he does go on to use a four-letter word - to accentuate his evocation of metal ripping through skin and bones. The Traditional Values Coalition would no doubt lobby to shut down the endowment were it to disseminate such filth.

Another of the movie's soldiers, Robert Beatty, a 33-year-old Army lifer with three children back home, wonders whether Americans who "don't have any direct family members in the military" regard the war as anything other than "just entertainment" and guesses that they lost interest once "major combat" had given way to the far deadlier minor combat that followed. A Gallup poll last year showed that most Americans might fall into that group, since two-thirds of those surveyed had no relative, friend or co-worker serving in Iraq. Does that vast unconnected majority understand what's going on there? Sergeant Beatty gives his answer in one of the film's most poignant passages: "If you watch this, you're going to go get your popcorn out of the microwave and talk about what I say. You'll forget me by the end. ..."

The words land so hard because we are already forgetting, or at least turning our backs. In Washington the gears are shifting to all Social Security all the time. A fast growing plurality of the country wants troops withdrawn from Iraq, but being so detached from the war they are unlikely to make a stink about it. The civilian leaders who conceived this adventure are clever at maintaining the false illusion that the end is just around the corner anyway.

They do this by moving the goal posts for "mission accomplished" as frequently as they have changed the rationale for us entering this war in the first place. In the walk-up to the Inauguration, even Iraq's Election Day was quietly downsized in importance so a sixth V-I Day further off in the future could be substituted. Dick Cheney told Don Imus on Inauguration morning that "we can bring our boys home" and that "our mission is complete" once the Iraqis "can defend themselves." What that means, and when exactly that might be is, shall we say, unclear. President Bush and Prime Minister Allawi told the press in unison last September that there were "nearly 100,000 fully trained and equipped" Iraqi security forces ready to carry out that self-defense. Condoleezza Rice told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee this month that there are 120,000. Time magazine says this week that the actual figure of fully trained ground soldiers is 14,000, but hey: in patriotism as it's been redefined for this war, loving the troops means never having to say you're sorry - or even having to say the word Iraq in an Inaugural address.

Maureen Dowd: Torture Chicks Gone Wild



January 30, 2005
OP-ED COLUMNIST
Torture Chicks Gone Wild
By MAUREEN DOWD

WASHINGTON

By the time House Republicans were finished with him, Bill Clinton must have thought of a thong as a torture device.

For the Bush administration, it actually is.

A former American Army sergeant who worked as an Arabic interpreter at Gitmo has written a book pulling back the veil on the astounding ways female interrogators used a toxic combination of sex and religion to try to break Muslim detainees at the U.S. prison camp in Cuba. It's not merely disgusting. It's beyond belief.

The Bush administration never worries about anything. But these missionaries and zealous protectors of values should be worried about the American soul. The president never mentions Osama, but he continues to use 9/11 as an excuse for American policies that bend the rules and play to our worst instincts.

"I have really struggled with this because the detainees, their families and much of the world will think this is a religious war based on some of the techniques used, even though it is not the case," the former sergeant, Erik R. Saar, 29, told The Associated Press. The A.P. got a manuscript of his book, deemed classified pending a Pentagon review.

What good is it for President Bush to speak respectfully of Islam and claim Iraq is not a religious war if the Pentagon denigrates Islamic law - allowing its female interrogators to try to make Muslim men talk in late-night sessions featuring sexual touching, displays of fake menstrual blood, and parading in miniskirt, tight T-shirt, bra and thong underwear?

It's like a bad porn movie, "The Geneva Monologues." All S and no M.

The A.P. noted that "some Guantánamo prisoners who have been released say they were tormented by 'prostitutes.' "

Mr. Saar writes about what he calls "disturbing" practices during his time in Gitmo from December 2002 to June 2003, including this anecdote related by Paisley Dodds, an A.P. reporter:

A female military interrogator who wanted to turn up the heat on a 21-year-old Saudi detainee who allegedly had taken flying lessons in Arizona before 9/11 removed her uniform top to expose a snug T-shirt. She began belittling the prisoner - who was praying with his eyes closed - as she touched her breasts, rubbed them against the Saudi's back and commented on his apparent erection.

After the prisoner spat in her face, she left the room to ask a Muslim linguist how she could break the prisoner's reliance on God. The linguist suggested she tell the prisoner that she was menstruating, touch him, and then shut off the water in his cell so he couldn't wash.

"The concept was to make the detainee feel that after talking to her he was unclean and was unable to go before his God in prayer and gain strength," Mr. Saar recounted, adding: "She then started to place her hands in her pants as she walked behind the detainee. As she circled around him he could see that she was taking her hand out of her pants. When it became visible the detainee saw what appeared to be red blood on her hand. She said, 'Who sent you to Arizona?' He then glared at her with a piercing look of hatred. She then wiped the red ink on his face. He shouted at the top of his lungs, spat at her and lunged forward," breaking out of an ankle shackle.

"He began to cry like a baby," the author wrote, adding that the interrogator's parting shot was: "Have a fun night in your cell without any water to clean yourself."

A female civilian contractor kept her "uniform" - a thong and miniskirt - on the back of the door of an interrogation room, the author says.

Who are these women? Who allows this to happen? Why don't the officers who allow it get into trouble? Why do Rummy and Paul Wolfowitz still have their jobs?

The military did not deny the specifics, but said the prisoners were treated "humanely" and in a way consistent "with legal obligations prohibiting torture." However the Bush White House is redefining torture these days, the point is this: Such behavior degrades the women who are doing it, the men they are doing it to, and the country they are doing it for.

There's nothing wrong with trying to squeeze information out of detainees. But isn't it simply more effective to throw them in isolation and try to build some sort of relationship?

I doubt that the thong tease works as well on inmates at Gitmo as it did on Bill Clinton in the Oval Office.

Saturday, January 29, 2005

Philip Johnson Is Dead at 98


Arnold Newman/Liasion – Getty Images
Philip Johnson with his Glass House in July, 1949 in New Canaan, Conn.

January 27, 2005
Philip Johnson Is Dead at 98; Architecture's Restless Intellect
By PAUL GOLDBERGER

Philip Johnson, at once the elder statesman and the enfant terrible of American architecture, died yesterday at the compound surrounding the Glass House, the celebrated residence he built for himself in New Canaan, Conn. He was 98.

His death was disclosed by David Whitney, his companion of 45 years.

Often considered the dean of American architects, Mr. Johnson was known less for his individual buildings than for the sheer force of his presence on the architectural scene, which he served as a combination godfather, gadfly, scholar, patron, critic, curator and cheerleader. His 90th birthday, in July 1996, was marked by symposiums, lectures, an outpouring of essays in his honor and back-to-back dinners at two venerable New York institutions he had played a major role in creating: the Museum of Modern Art, whose department of architecture and design he joined in 1930, and the Four Seasons restaurant, which he designed as part of the Seagram Building in 1958.

His long career was a study in contradictions. He first became famous as an impassioned advocate of Modern architecture, and his early writings helped establish the reputation of European Modernists like Mies van der Rohe and Walter Gropius in this country. He began his architectural career as Mies's leading acolyte. But what fascinated him most was the idea of the new, and once he had helped establish Modernist architecture in the United States, he moved on, experimenting with decorative Classicism, embracing the reuse of historical elements that would become known as postmodernism, and finally returning again to Modernism, yet one with an expressive and highly emotional energy.

Mr. Johnson's own architecture received mixed reviews and often startled the public and his fellow architects. Because of his frequent changes of style, he was often accused of pandering to fashion and of designing buildings that were facile and shallow. Yet he created several designs, including the Glass House, the sculpture garden of the Museum of Modern Art, and the pre-Columbian gallery at Dumbarton Oaks in Washington that are widely considered among the architectural masterworks of the 20th century. And for his entire career, his engagement with architectural theory and ideas was as deep as that of any scholar.

He was the first winner of the Pritzker Prize, the $100,000 award established in 1979 by the Pritzker family of Chicago to honor an architect of international stature. In 1978, he won the Gold Medal of the American Institute of Architects, the highest award the American profession bestows on any of its members.

As an architect, he made his mark arguing the importance of the aesthetic side of architecture and claimed that he had no interest in buildings except as works of art. Yet he was so eager to build that he willingly took commissions from real estate developers who refused to meet his aesthetic standards. He liked to refer to himself, with only some irony, as a whore. And in the 1930's, this man who believed that art ranked above all else took a bizarre and, he later conceded, deeply mistaken detour into right-wing politics, suspending his career to work on behalf of Gov. Huey P. Long of Louisiana and later the radio priest Father Charles Coughlin, and expressing more than passing admiration for Hitler.

Mr. Johnson's foray into fascism was over by the time the United States entered World War II, and in the mid-1950's he sought to publicly atone to Jews by designing a synagogue in Port Chester, N.Y., for no fee. But to the end of his life the contradictions continued. With his dignified bearing and elegant, tailored suits, he looked every bit the part of a distinguished, genteel aristocrat, but he played the celebrity culture of the 1980's and 90's as successfully as a rock star. To the public, he was far and away the best-known living architect, and his crisply outlined, round face, marked by heavy, round black spectacles of his own design, was a common sight on television programs and magazine covers.

Except for his brief involvement in right-wing politics, all of his careers revolved around architecture. He began his professional life as a writer, historian and curator and did not enter architecture school until he was 35. Even when he became one of the nation's most eminent practicing architects, he continued to be a major patron of institutions and of younger architects, whose work he followed with avid interest.

He began his career as an ardent champion of Modernism, but unlike many of the movement's early proselytizers, he changed with the times, and his own work showed a major movement away from beginnings that were heavily influenced by Mies. In the late 1950's, just after he had collaborated with Mies on the Seagram Building on Park Avenue, he introduced elements of classical architecture into his buildings, beginning a long quest to find ways of connecting contemporary architecture to historical form. It was a quest that would begin with highly abstracted versions of Classicism in the 1960's and culminate in a much more literal use of the architectural forms of the past in his revivalist skyscrapers of the 1980's.

That phase of Mr. Johnson's career included such well-known monuments as the classically detailed pink-granite AT&T Building (now the Sony building) on Madison Avenue, which he completed in 1984 with John Burgee, then his partner; the Republic Bank tower (now NCNB Center) in Houston, which used elements of Flemish Renaissance architecture; the Transco Tower (now the Williams Tower) in Houston, which recapitulated the setback forms of a romantic 1920's tower in glass, perhaps his finest skyscraper; and the PPG Place in Pittsburgh, a reflective glass tower whose Gothic form copied the shape of the tower of the Houses of Parliament in London.

Focusing on Historical Form

Institutional clients also received their share of Mr. Johnson's fixation with historical form: he designed a Romanesque structure in brick for the Cleveland Play House and a Classical building based on the designs of the French visionary architect Étienne-Louis Boullée for the architecture school of the University of Houston.

In the late 1980's Mr. Johnson's restless mind, having played a major role in shifting American architecture toward postmodernism, with its reuse of traditional elements, moved on yet again. Fascinated by the intense, highly abstract work of a group of younger Modernist architects who were to become known as the deconstructivists, Mr. Johnson began to incorporate elements of their architecture into his own work.

He was particularly entranced with the buildings of the Los Angeles architect Frank Gehry, whose complex, seemingly irrational forms would appear to be the antithesis of the cool, rational, ordered architectural world of Mr. Johnson's first mentor, Mies, and much of his late work reflected Mr. Gehry's influence.

Mr. Johnson, an urbane, elegant figure, was perhaps the most socially prominent New York architect since Stanford White. Born to wealth, he and Mr. Whitney, a curator and art dealer, lived well, for many years in a town house on East 52nd Street that Mr. Johnson had originally designed as a guest house for John D. Rockefeller 3d, then in an elaborately decorated apartment in Museum Tower above the Museum of Modern Art and always on weekends in the famous Glass House compound.

Mr. Johnson had lunch daily amid other prominent and powerful New Yorkers at a special table in the corner of the Grill Room of the Four Seasons. His guest was likely to be a young architect in whose work he had taken an interest, and for years his table functioned as a kind of miniature architectural salon.

In the evenings, he was frequently seen at exclusive social events, for years by himself and in the last decade, as he felt greater ease in making his relationship with Mr. Whitney public, with his companion. He was among the few architects whose comings and goings were considered worthy of notice in the gossip columns.

He had been an active art collector since the days when, as a student traveling in Germany, he bought a pair of Paul Klees from the artist. Eventually he came to be a collector of contemporary art: advised by Mr. Whitney, he filled his walls with paintings by Roy Lichtenstein, Andy Warhol and Jasper Johns when they were just gaining public attention, and he amassed one of the most complete collections of paintings by Frank Stella in private hands.

Mr. Johnson not only lived and ate in places of his own design, he also worked in them. For many years his office was in the Seagram Building. Mr. Johnson practiced alone there for some years, then collaborated with the architect Richard Foster, for a time, and in 1967 formed a partnership with John Burgee.

It was this partnership that transformed Mr. Johnson from a scholar-architect designing small to medium-size institutional buildings for well-to-do clients into a major force in commercial architecture. Mr. Burgee's arrival coincided with the firm's movement toward a number of major, widely acclaimed skyscraper projects, including the IDS Center in Minneapolis and Pennzoil Place in Houston. Mr. Johnson's leanings were always toward the aesthetic issues in design, and in Mr. Burgee he had a partner who could serve not only as a colleague in design but also as an executive overseeing the kind of large architectural office required to produce major skyscrapers.

As if to mark Mr. Burgee's role, the Johnson-Burgee firm moved in 1986 into the elliptical skyscraper at 885 Third Avenue, between 53rd and 54th Streets. Popularly known as the Lipstick Building, it had been designed by the partners together. But the partnership was not to last long beyond the move: Mr. Burgee, eager to occupy center stage, negotiated a more limited role for Mr. Johnson and in 1991 exercised the prerogative he had as the firm's chief executive and eased Mr. Johnson out altogether.

It proved an unwise decision: the firm, crippled by an arbitration decision unrelated to Mr. Johnson, soon went into bankruptcy, all but ending Mr. Burgee's career. Mr. Johnson, who had severed ties to his former firm, had no liability and went on to rent a smaller space in the Lipstick Building, gleefully hanging out his shingle in his mid-80's and declaring himself in business as a solo practitioner. Before long, he had several commissions, including a cathedral in Dallas, and his career had recharged itself.

Philip Cortelyou Johnson was born on July 8, 1906, in Cleveland, the son of Homer H. Johnson, a well-to-do lawyer, and Louise Pope Johnson. Supported by a fortune that consisted largely of the Aluminum Company of America stock given him by his father, Mr. Johnson went to Harvard to study Greek, but became excited by architecture and spent the years immediately after his graduation in 1927 touring Europe and looking at the early buildings of the developing Modern architecture movement.

He teamed up with Henry-Russell Hitchcock, at that time the movement's chief academic partisan in the United States, and their travels together resulted in their book "The International Style," published in 1932 and now a classic. "We have an architecture still," is how Mr. Johnson and Mr. Hitchcock concluded the book, which played a major role in introducing Americans to the work of European Modernists like Mies, Gropius and Le Corbusier, then barely known here.

In 1930, Mr. Johnson joined the architecture department at a new institution in New York, the Museum of Modern Art. He moved the museum quickly to the forefront of the architectural avant-garde, sponsoring exhibitions on contemporary themes and arranging for visits by Gropius, Le Corbusier and Mies, for whom he also negotiated his first American commission.

Mr. Johnson left the museum in 1936 to pursue his political agenda, dividing his time among Berlin, Louisiana and his family's home in Ohio. By the summer of 1940, his infatuation with right-wing politics had faded, although as Franz Schulze, his biographer, wrote in 1994, it was never clear whether he withdrew because he had changed his mind or because he had failed to achieve political success. "In politics he proved to be a model of futility," Mr. Schulze wrote in "Philip Johnson: Life and Work. "He was never much of a political threat to anyone, still less an effective doer of either political good or political evil."

In 1941, at 35, Mr. Johnson turned once and for all to the field that would occupy him for the rest of his life and enrolled at the Harvard Graduate School of Design to begin the process of becoming an architect.

At Harvard, Mr. Johnson did what few students, even those of great means, have been able to do: he actually built the project he designed as a thesis. It was a house in the style of Mies, its lot surrounded by a wall that merges into the structure, and it still stands at 9 Ash Street in Cambridge, Mass.

After wartime service in the United States Army - the F.B.I. had investigated Mr. Johnson for his fascist leanings, but the government decided he was sufficiently repentant to wear the uniform (he never saw combat) - he returned in 1946 to the Museum of Modern Art. At the same time he began to slowly build up an architectural practice of his own, combining it with his career as a writer and curator.

He designed a small, boxy house, also highly influenced by Mies, for a client in Sagaponack, Long Island, in 1946, but his first significant building, and still perhaps his most famous, was not for another client at all but, like the Cambridge house, for his own use: it was the Glass House in New Canaan, completed in 1949 with its counterpoint, a brick guest house.

The serene Glass House, a 56-foot-by-32-foot rectangle, is generally considered one of the 20th century's greatest residential structures. Like all of Mr. Johnson's early work, it was inspired by Mies, but its pure symmetry, dark colors and closeness to the earth marked it as a personal statement: calm and ordered rather than sleek and brittle.

A Home Becomes a Museum

Over the years, Mr. Johnson added to the Glass House property, turning it into a compound that became a veritable museum of his architecture, with buildings representing each phase of his career. A small, elegant white-columned pavilion by the lake was built in 1963; an art gallery, an underground building set into a hill, with pictures from Mr. Johnson's extensive collection of contemporary art set on movable panels, in 1965; the sculpture gallery of 1970, a sharply defined, irregular white structure covered with a greenhouselike glass roof; a library of stucco with a rounded tower that from a distance looks like a miniature castle (1980); a concrete-block tower, as much a piece of sculpture as a building, dedicated to his lifelong friend Lincoln Kirstein, the writer and New York City Ballet co-founder (1985); a "ghost house" of chain-link fence, honoring Mr. Gehry, who often used this material (1985); and finally, what Mr. Johnson called "Da Monsta," an irregularly shaped building of deep red with sharply curving walls, finished in 1995.

The "Monsta" -he could not quite bring himself to call one of his buildings a monster, but said its shape resembled it - is set at the gate of the estate and was intended to serve as a visitors center once the public was admitted to the property after his death. The compound was willed to the National Trust for Historic Preservation, which plans to run it as a museum.

In addition to Mr. Whitney, Mr. Johnson is survived by a sister, Jeannette Dempsey, now 102, of Cleveland.

After the Glass House was completed in 1949, Mr. Johnson received other residential commissions, including a number of houses in New Canaan. His first work on a very large scale, however, was the Seagram Building, designed with Mies. The deep bronze Seagram is considered by many critics to be the finest postwar skyscraper in New York.

But by then, Mr. Johnson was growing impatient with the limitations of the strict, austere Miesian vocabulary. He began to explore a more decorative sort of neo-Classicism, leading to designs like the Amon Carter Museum in Fort Worth (1961), the New York State Theater at Lincoln Center (1964) and the Bobst Library at New York University, designed in 1965 but not completed until 1973. His work in that period led the architectural historian Vincent Scully to refer to him as "admirably lucid, unsentimental and abstract, with the most ruthlessly aristocratic, highly studied taste of anyone practicing in America today."

"All that a nervous sensibility, lively intelligence and a stored mind can do, he does," Mr. Scully said.

Mr. Johnson's art collecting brought him a nearly continuous stream of commissions to design museums, and his ties to the Museum of Modern Art brought him the request to design the museum's 1951 and 1964 expansions beyond its original 1939 building, including the sculpture garden. He also designed the original Asia House gallery on East 64th Street, now the Russell Sage Foundation, as well as museums in Fort Worth; Utica, N.Y.; Lincoln, Neb.; and Corpus Christi, Tex.

Despite his record as a museum designer and his long association with the Modern, the museum's board, of which Mr. Johnson was a member, decided in 1978 to hire a different architect to design its new west wing. The job went to Cesar Pelli, and Mr. Johnson was deeply hurt.

For some time, relations cooled between him and the museum he had supported nearly since its founding, but eventually they resumed, and Mr. Johnson and Mr. Whitney moved into the apartment tower above the museum designed by Mr. Pelli. In 1984, as a tribute to Mr. Johnson as its founding curator, the museum's department of architecture and design named its exhibition space the Philip Johnson Gallery. And the Modern observed Mr. Johnson's 90th birthday with a pair of exhibitions: one of notable works of art that the architect had donated to the museum, and another of works given by architects in Mr. Johnson's honor. More recently, the architect Yoshio Taniguchi set to work on his design for the Modern's latest expansion, Mr. Johnson met occasionally with him to chat about the challenges of blending old and new.

The beginnings of his late career as a major commercial architect were not in New York, however, but in Minneapolis, through an immense project in 1972 for Investors Diversified Services, a financial conglomerate now part of American Express. A square-block complex containing a roughly octagonally shaped, 51-story glass tower, hotel and retail wing placed around a central glass-covered court, the design blended Mr. Johnson's interest in angular forms with a sensitive urbanism. It quickly became a focal point for downtown Minneapolis and was the first of a generation of what might be called social skyscrapers: towers that did not merely house office workers but also contained myriad public spaces.

Among the many observers impressed by the tower was Gerald D. Hines of Houston, a real estate developer who had begun his career as a builder of warehouses but who by the early 1970's had sought to make a mark with much larger buildings by prominent architects. Mr. Hines hired Mr. Johnson and Mr. Burgee to design Pennzoil Place, a twin-towered complex of glass in downtown Houston that was completed in 1976. One of the most widely known skyscrapers in the country, Pennzoil Place consists of two trapezoidal towers placed so as to leave two triangular areas open on the site. These areas were covered with steel and glass trusses to create greenhouselike lobbies; as a further formal gesture, each tower was given a slanted roof for the top seven floors.

Pennzoil Place would prove widely influential, but five years later Mr. Johnson and Mr. Burgee moved away from it with the design for one of the most startling skyscrapers of the last generation, the AT&T headquarters in New York, the so-called "Chippendale skyscraper" with a split pediment resembling an antique highboy.

During the 1980's Mr. Johnson and Mr. Burgee also designed major skyscrapers in Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, San Francisco and Dallas, many for Mr. Hines. Most of them, following the lead of the AT&T. Building, were lavishly finished in granite and marble and imitated some aspect of architecture of the past.

Mr. Johnson also designed the Crystal Cathedral in Garden Grove, Calif., and the Museum of Television and Radio on West 52nd Street in New York. With Mr. Burgee, he produced plans through the 1980's for office towers for Times Square. Widely criticized, they were never built. After the dissolution of his partnership with Mr. Burgee, he formed one with Alan Ritchie, a longtime associate, and produce several works for Donald J. Trump, including the glass tower at 1 Central Park West and projects for the Riverside South residential development; and plans for a cathedral for a gay congregation in Dallas. Mr. Johnson continued to go to work at Philip Johnson/Alan Ritchie Architects in the Seagram Building as recently as last year.

Though he gave up formal scholarship when he became an architect, he continued to write and lecture frequently. His constant theme, unchanged through all his stylistic variations, was his belief in the need to view architecture as an art, separating him from the socially minded early Modernists whose cause he once championed so ardently.

In a famous lecture in 1954 at Harvard titled "The Seven Crutches of Modern Architecture," he said, "Merely that a building works is not sufficient." Later, in an oft-quoted remark, he said, "I would rather sleep in Chartres Cathedral with the nearest toilet two blocks away than in a Harvard house with back-to-back bathrooms."

Years later, Mr. Johnson told an audience: "We still have a monumental architecture. To me, the drive for monumentality is as inbred as the desire for food and sex, regardless of how we denigrate it."

But he ended by arguing: "Monuments differ in different periods. Each age has its own.

"Maybe, just maybe, we shall at last come to care for the most important, most challenging, surely the most satisfying of all architectural creations: building cities for people to live in."

A Young Taipei Finds Its Groove








Karen Smith/Lonely Planet Images
The Chiang kai-Shek Memorial.




Sam Yeh for The New York Times
Omni, a furniture shop owned by the pop singer Jay Chou.


Sam Yeh for The New York Times
Mint, the latest club by the interior designer Mark Lintott, is in the 101-story Taipei 101 building.

January 23, 2005
A Young Taipei Finds Its Groove
By ANDREW YANG

A DECADE ago in Taipei, finding a decent cup of coffee would have proved a challenge. Now, there are all-night dance clubs and boutique hotels, MTV Taiwan and espresso bars. Change is a constant in the city, the capital of Taiwan, which has been transformed significantly along with its cosmopolitan counterparts Hong Kong and Singapore. As a whole generation emerges - nearly a quarter of the electorate of Taiwan is under 30 - the culture is as much about playing hard as working hard.

"When I first came here, people just lived to work, and now it seems to be switching around," said Mark Lintott, 45, a Taipei-based British interior designer who arrived in the city 15 years ago. "Now, people are much more willing to spend money outside out of profit creation, and they seem to be genuinely having a good time."

Since 1989, when the government eased travel restrictions, particularly to mainland China (nonstop charter flights over the Chinese New Year's holiday, the first nonstops since 1949, were announced last week), Taipei has benefited from a steady stream of foreign visitors. A city where Mandarin Chinese is primarily spoken - as it is in Beijing and Shanghai - Taipei remains one of the most bustling and quintessentially Asian cities in the region.

Night markets can be found throughout the city, with vendors of discount clothes and other goods next to food carts selling such favorites as oyster noodles and stinky tofu, a fermented bean curd. Traditional cultural treasures like the serene Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Park and the National Palace Museum, north of the city, are some of the must-see landmarks. And with an emerging culture catering to young people, the city is becoming a cool place to visit.

About 2.5 million of Taiwan's 22 million residents live in Taipei. Its main axis is Civil Boulevard, which runs east-west and acts as a central artery to the city's major malls and shopping centers.

From more progressive shopping centers on the west side like Idée and Mitsukoshi to such megamalls as the Breeze Center and the Core Pacific on the east side, department stores are thriving as a result of a younger, more self-conscious generation of consumers, said the 29-year-old designer Robyn Hung.

"There are more TV channels reporting fashion trends from Paris, Milan and New York, and information gets around quicker," said Ms. Hung, who has a boutique on the second floor of Idée that primarily sells women's clothes by younger independent designers. She started her line four years ago after graduating from the London College of Fashion.

One of the largest symbols of shopping and consumption in Taipei is the Core Pacific Center. Opened in 2001, it is a 12-story sphere, with a building fitted around it. Designed by the Los Angeles-based Jon Jerde, who also designed the Bellagio in Las Vegas, it is home to brands like Hugo Boss, the Mira department store and, on the top floor, a nightclub called Plush.

As a response to the recent wave of large-scale shopping malls, the city has sprouted its first district primarily catering to 20-somethings. Nestled in a series of side streets and alleyways between Civil Boulevard to the north, Renai Road to the south and Dunhua South Road and Guangfu South Road to the west and east, this district has developed in the last few years. It is still a mostly residential neighborhood, but businesses have sprung up on the ground floors of apartment buildings and other structures that were not typically used as shops.

Walking around, visitors will come across Omni, a furniture store that carries a stock of midcentury and contemporary furniture by Verner Panton and Eero Saarinen. Billed as an "antique" store, it has an expansive glass facade that showcases its stock of modern and vintage chairs, T-shirts and travel accessories. Owned by the pop singer Jay Chou, Omni has become a popular tourist attraction for visitors hoping to catch a glimpse of the singer.

"Before, the cool shops would be scattered around different neighborhoods, and now all the big department stores are on the main road," said Nancy Chen, 29, a graduate of Parsons School of Design in New York, who recently set up her graphic design office, Edible Sound Project, in an apartment building in this area. "But now, as the street is becoming overly commercialized, shops are developing as individual boutiques in the lanes and alleys."

Within this neighborhood, places to eat include the China Bar, Tea and DJ Restaurant, 1F, No. 24 Lane 205, Chung-siao East Road, Section 4, (886-2) 2772-7622, which serves an array of Chinese and other Asian food and where dishes like pork ribs and chicken curry are not out of the ordinary. The interior of China Bar resembles a store that exclusively sells used 1960's furniture, but the most notable feature is the large prints of Kama Sutra pages wallpapered to the bathroom walls. Dinner for two, about $25 (prices at 33 Taiwan dollars to the U.S. dollar).

For a more casual setting, the Zaka coffeehouse, 1F, No. 37, Lane 177, Section 1, Dunhua South Road, (886-2) 2773-7009, is a popular local hangout that offers free Wi-Fi connections.

When you get toward the southern end near Anho Road, a cluster of hip bars and lounges are on a leafy and seemingly quiet road that diagonally crosses the city grid. One of the most notorious bars is Carnegie's, a popular hangout for foreigners, where women can frequently be found dancing on tabletops on rowdy weekend nights.

This area is primarily known for its more upscale lounges, popular with large groups. For a more laid-back atmosphere, try Champagne 2, which is known for its Champagne infused with litchi flavor. The atmosphere there is typical of many of the lounges on this street - the interiors are often tasteful and not outlandish, the clientele tends to be quite young, and martini cocktails are the standard.

The trend toward more modern and sleek interiors has also spread to the hotels in Taipei. In the past, the 14-story Grand Hotel was the most popular, and resembled a large Buddhist temple with a huge pitched roof. Now, the emphasis is on cool, sumptuous interiors as well as more personalized service.

Two branches of the warm and cozy Les Suites hotels recently opened, one at 12 Ching Cheng Street, (886-2) 8712-7589, fax (886-2) 8712-7699, near Sung Shan Airport to the north, and another south of the city at 135 Da-An Road, Section 1 (886-2) 8773-3668, fax (886-2) 8773-3788; www.suitetpe.com for both. Doubles at both from about $130.

Le Petit Sherwood, 370 Tun Hwa South Road, Section 1, (886-2) 2754-1166, fax (886-2) 2754 3399, is also in a southern part of the city. Featuring funky interiors, it opened in 2000 as one of the first boutique hotels in the city. Doubles start at about $200.

In Taipei, there is a greater expectation of clubs, bars and lounges that look as trendy as those in New York or London. "The night life in the city has moved from an immature adolescence to now, where it's just catching up a bit to everybody else," said Mr. Lintott, who designed Opium Den, one of the first trendy lounges in Taipei, in 1996. He has watched the nightclubs become increasingly outlandish with each project.

His latest club, Mint, 45 Shifu Road, Section 4, (886-2) 8101-8662, is in the lower level of the world's tallest building, Taipei 101 (101 stories, and 1,667 feet, tall). Although the silvery structure is set for occupation this spring, the mall on the ground floor has been in operation for nearly a year.

Mint, whose name refers to its monetary connotation, includes a V.I.P. room, a modular mahogany wall full of wines, floating L.E.D. displays behind the bar, a translucent, glowing dance floor and custom-designed pieces of acrylic furniture. On a Friday night last fall, throngs of clubgoers occupied the dance floor. The dressy crowd was mostly Asian, but there were a good number of Americans and Europeans in their 20's scattered about.

Entry to the clubs, which can cost as much as $30, can be competitive. To get in, people need the proper connections and dress, and the social scene seems to lean heavily toward English-speaking Chinese, local celebrities and businessmen.

Competition has indeed heated up in the city, with large-scale supper clubs such as Luxy and the Ministry of Sound - one of Asia's largest clubs, with three floors and capacity for 2,500 - competing heavily for clubgoers and big-name D.J.'s. Many of these clubs are set up like large raves, and visitors can expect big crowds of sweaty dancers pulsating hip to hip. Techno music, as well as hip-hop, is the norm.

"People in Taipei, especially the younger ones, are getting more and more sociable," said Ms. Hung, the fashion designer. "We're more aware of not just Taiwan, but the whole world as well."

http://travel2.nytimes.com/2005/01/23/travel/23taipei.html

The Firefox Explosion

The Firefox Explosion
It's fast, secure, open source - and super popular. The hot new browser called Firefox is rocking the software world. (Watch your back, Bill Gates.)
By Josh McHughPage 1 of 3 next »

For Rob Davis, the final straw came during a beautiful weekend last summer, which he spent holed up in his Minneapolis apartment killing a zombie. The week before, a malicious software program had invaded Davis' PC through his browser, Internet Explorer, using a technique called the DSO exploit. His computer had been repurposed as a "zombie box" - its CPU and bandwidth co-opted to pump reams of spam onto the Internet. Furious, Davis dropped out of a planned Lake Superior camping trip to instead back up his computer and reformat his crippled hard drive. Then he vowed never to open IE again.

Lucky for Davis, a new browser had just appeared on the scene - Firefox, a fast, simple, and secure piece of software that was winning acclaim from others who also had grown frustrated with Internet Explorer. A programmer friend told Davis about Firefox. He didn't know that the browser was an open source project and a descendant of Netscape Navigator now poised to avenge Netscape's defeat at the hands of Microsoft. He just knew that he didn't want to waste another weekend cursing at his machine. So Davis drove to the friend's house and copied Firefox onto his battered laptop. He hasn't had a problem since - and now he's telling anybody who will listen about Firefox's virtues. "I'm no anti-Microsoft zealot, but it's unconscionable that they make 98 percent of the operating systems in the world and they let things like this happen to people," says Davis, a PR man by day who liked Firefox so much that he initiated a fundraising campaign to help promote the browser. "There's a lot of pain out there."

Firefox couldn't have arrived at a better time for people like Davis - or at a worse time for Microsoft. Ever since Internet Explorer toppled Netscape in 1998, browser innovation has been more or less limited to pop-up ads, spyware, and viruses. Over the past six years, IE has become a third world bus depot, the gathering point for a crush of hawkers, con artists, and pickpockets. The recent outbreak of malware - from the spyware on Davis' machine to the .ject Trojan, which uses a bug in IE to snatch sensitive data from an infected PC - has prompted early adopters to look for an alternate Web browser. Even in beta, Firefox's clean, intuitive interface, quick page-loading, and ability to elude intruders elicited a thunderous response. In the month following its official November launch, more than 10 million people downloaded Firefox, taking the first noticeable bite out of IE's market share since the browser wars of the mid-'90s.

Like most open source software, Firefox is forever a work in progress, the product of continual tweaking by thousands of programmers all over the world. But two people in particular are most responsible for the browser's success: Blake Ross, an angular, hyperkinetic 19-year-old Stanford sophomore with spiky black hair, and Ben Goodger, a stout, soft-spoken 24-year-old New Zealander. At age 14, Ross, logging on to his family's America Online account, started fixing bugs for the Mozilla Group, a cadre of programmers responsible for maintaining the source code of Netscape's browsers. Ross quickly became disenchanted with Netscape's feature creep and in 2002 brashly decided to splinter off and develop a pared-down, fast, easy-to-use browser. Goodger, who plays the David Filo or Larry Page to Ross' frontman, took the reins when Ross became a full-time college student in 2003. Goodger pulled the project's loose ends together and whipped the browser into shape for the release of Firefox 1.0 late last year.

What makes Firefox different from other open source projects is its consumer appeal. Until now, the open source community has been very good at creating useful software but lousy at finding nontechnical users. By liberating Firefox from the "by geeks, for geeks" ethos, Ross and Goodger have moved open source out of server rooms and onto Microsoft's turf: the desktop. Borrowing from the Net-based grassroots techniques of the recent political season, the Firefox inner circle has turned satisfied users into foot soldiers and missionaries. How's this for a marketer's dream: In the weeks following the debut, Firefox contributors and fans threw their own launch parties in 392 cities around the world.

"People thought the browser wars were over," Ross says, relishing the giant-killer role. "But now there's a widespread perception that IE is not secure - and here we are." What started out as one schoolboy's exercise in minimalism, with a nod to Google's back-to-basics obsession, has tapped into a growing desire for simplicity among ordinary computer users. "The success of this thing has totally surprised us," Goodger adds. "Firefox has really touched a nerve."

Firefox the browser is an impressive piece of software. It's easy to use, easy on the eyes, and safer than IE - partly because it's too new to have amassed a following of evil hackers. Firefox the phenomenon is something much bigger. It's a combination of innovations in engineering, developer politics, and consumer marketing.

Computer users embraced the browser almost immediately. Mark Fletcher, founder of Bloglines, a weblog-aggregation service, reports that Firefox rocketed from 5 percent of Bloglines' server traffic to 20 percent in the month after the beta version was released. Software developers are on board, too - Ross and Goodger made sure that writing Firefox add-ons would be simple. Coders have created more than 175 extensions that perform specific, sometimes delightful functions, like incorporating an iTunes controller in the browser's border or a three-day weather forecast that pulls data from Weather.com and displays sun, cloud, and rain icons in the Firefox status bar. Two popular extensions make it easier to subscribe to RSS feeds through Bloglines. "Anyone can write programs that work with this browser," Fletcher says. "I look at the fanfare and excitement that Firefox is causing - even my parents are using it and loving it." Based on what his server logs are telling him, Fletcher predicts that Firefox will represent close to 50 percent of Bloglines' traffic by the time Longhorn, Microsoft's long-awaited browserless operating system, is ready in 2006. At BoingBoing, nearly half of all visitors are already using Mozilla browsers.

Whatever success Firefox sees, it will come from social engineering as much as software engineering. Firefox has been the product of a massive get-out-the-vote effort. While Goodger was refining Firefox code, Ross started Spread Firefox, a community site that hosts Firefox blogs and gives points to a volunteer army of operatives for converting the masses. SpreadFirefox.com functions as a clearinghouse for marketing and recruiting strategies, a coordination center for coders, banner designers, and evangelists. The site was built on Civic Space, software developed by Carnegie Mellon grad Chris Messina for the Howard Dean online campaign. "Software development is a political process," says Messina.

Spread Firefox has served as the engine of an impressive fundraising campaign put together by zombie victim Rob Davis. In July, Davis, an account director with PR firm Haberman & Associates, contacted Ross and pitched an idea: Raise enough money from Firefox fans to run an ad in The New York Times. Over 10 days in October, more than 10,000 donors visited the Spread Firefox site and kicked in an average of $25 apiece, enough to pay for a two-page spread. The Firefox ad ran in the Times on December 16, featuring the name of every donor in barely readable, 4.5-point type, prompting another deluge of downloads.

OK, time for a reality check. Explorer is still the choice of 90 percent of Internet users. As user-friendly as Firefox may be, most of its current users are early-adopter types, bloggers, people with an ideological aversion to Microsoft. Almost every PC sold since September includes IE and the latest browser security patches. The number of Firefox downloads will surely slow, maybe even plateau, when the supply of easy converts runs dry.

But Firefox doesn't have to overtake IE to cause havoc in Redmond. Microsoft had essentially given up on Internet Explorer development - focusing instead on its next-gen OS, Longhorn. With Longhorn, the company hopes to make the stand-alone browser obsolete by incorporating Web browsing into the desktop. As part of the transition, Microsoft has created the developer language XAML, an heir to HTML. Until a few months ago, it looked like the shift to Longhorn would give Microsoft control of the Web's de facto standards. Now, with Microsoft's share in the browser market slipping - IE has lost 5 percent in the past six months, almost all of it to Firefox - Web designers can't afford to ignore the standards of Tim Berners-Lee's W3C, which Mozilla has hewed to but which Microsoft has regarded as strictly optional. Which means Bill Gates' troops must now turn back to IE and battle the ghost of Netscape.

Officially, Microsoft addresses Firefox with a sharp-toothed smile and open arms. "Any time someone creates a new piece of software for the Windows platform, it's great," says Gary Schare, director of product management for Windows. "Occasionally, a new application competes with one of ours." In recent interviews, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer has responded to questions about Firefox evasively, claiming that Microsoft hasn't abandoned browser development and that the XP Service Pack 2, Microsoft's latest security patch, was actually a major browser release. The day that the Firefox ad ran in the Times, Microsoft made a less-splashy announcement of its own - it acquired anti-spyware software maker Giant. Microsoft insists it's not changing its tack because of Firefox, but watch for the company to move more quickly to release browser updates and security patches - and to add a dash of marketing to sweeten the mix.

This browser war is different from the first go-round, when Internet Explorer came from nowhere to crush the dominant Netscape Navigator. Unlike in the past decade, Microsoft can't fight off Firefox by lowballing; both browsers are free. More important, Microsoft isn't battling a startup in round two - it's battling thousands of open source programmers and several non-Microsoft titans that have rallied around Firefox. Sun Microsystems employs a dozen Firefox coders in Beijing. IBM has two dozen coders on the case in Austin, Texas. Google has hosted a Mozilla developer conference, not to mention Firefox's default start page, and rumors of a "gbrowser," a Google-branded browser built on top of Firefox, continue to swirl.

Such teamwork is particularly effective when it comes to addressing pressing concerns, like security. It took months for Redmond to fix the hole in IE exploited by the .ject Trojan last June. A few weeks later, a programmer reported a Firefox bug that allowed a malicious Web site to spy on the information users entered into online forms. In less than 36 hours, teams of open source programmers rallied to create a patch, which was then incorporated into the current release of Firefox and also made available as an easily added extension.

It's launch day for Firefox 1.0 at the Silicon Valley offices of the Mozilla Foundation, and the Web servers are cranking. By nightfall, people around the world will download the open source browser more than a million times - swiftly earning Firefox a greater share of the browser market than anything not called Internet Explorer. Grinning engineers move from desk to desk, reading congratulatory emails aloud, trading high-fives, laughing, and cheering.

A few of the faithful have been working on what has become the Firefox code for nearly a decade. They signed on with Netscape just after Marc Andreessen made his way west from the University of Illinois' National Center for Supercomputing Applications to start the browser company. Netscape, of course, introduced the Web to the masses, took Wall Street by storm, and was then crushed by Microsoft. In 1998, a battered Netscape sold out to AOL for $4.2 billion. The release of IE4 that year made it clear that Netscape had lost. Explorer was faster, slicker, preloaded on every new PC, and, though the anti-Microsoft crowd hated to admit it, just plain better than Netscape Communicator, a slow-moving, unwieldy clump of programs. Even AOL wouldn't touch Communicator, choosing to stay with IE as its default browser. In what Netscape veterans now refer to as "the reset," Netscape released the Communicator source code to the world in March 1998 and renamed it Mozilla.

Around this time, Blake Ross, a Florida ninth grader whose coding experience consisted of piecing together a couple of rudimentary videogames, started hacking away at Mozilla. "It was incredible - just realizing that you can touch something that so many people use," says Ross. "It's a great feeling to make a little change to the code and then actually see the change in the window of a big, famous product. You've caused something to happen in an application that's being used all over the world."

In 2000, as Ross was getting comfortable with the nooks and crannies of Mozilla's million-odd lines of code, AOL released Netscape Navigator 6 to a chorus of raspberries from reviewers and users. Inside Netscape, agonized Mozilla programmers tried to clean up the sprawling mess of a product with version 6.1 and 6.2.

Then Ross, known to the Mozilla Foundation as just another precocious, diligent bug fixer, teamed up with Dave Hyatt, a former Netscape user interface programmer who now works for Apple Computer. In 2002, they announced they had "forked" the Mozilla code base, pulling out Mozilla's layout engine, called Gecko, and using a new user interface language, XUL. They posted a short manifesto proposing a tightly written piece of software called mozilla/browser. The goal was modest: no bloat. Inspired by Google's simple interface, they set out to build a stripped-down, stand-alone browser, a refutation of the feature creep that had grounded Netscape. "Lots of Mozilla people didn't get it," Ross recalls. "They'd say, 'This is just the product we have now, but with less features.' Meanwhile, the Mozilla product at the time had about 10,000 options. You basically needed to know the secret handshake to get anything done. It sounds corny, but it was important to make something that Mom and Dad could use."

"Our aim was a browser that could reach the mainstream and get people away from using IE," Hyatt remembers. "There was tension over the way we were coming in and taking control."

Goodger, who was working for Netscape from New Zealand, loved the idea. Like Ross, Goodger had started tinkering with Mozilla code in the late '90s, fixing bugs and submitting hacks that were impressive enough to earn him a job at Mozilla, paid for by Netscape.

Mozilla/browser became Phoenix, then Firebird, then Firefox, all the while winning converts among the Mozilla crowd. But the two core developers - Ross and Hyatt - got distracted. Hyatt left for Apple in late 2002 to work on the Safari browser. Ross started his freshman year at Stanford the following fall. "The project was bogging down," Hyatt remembers. "Somebody needed to step in and finish the thing." Goodger, a car enthusiast with a blog that goes into exquisite detail about subjects like engine placement and torque, took over. "When I look at cars, I'm looking at how well they are put together, from the panel gaps to the interior fabrics. I suppose I'm very obsessive about detail and style. It helps me make software that looks good and works well."

As the project's lead engineer, Goodger began a frenzied six-month stint of reviewing the code patches and bug fixes forwarded to him by his team and grafting the approved changes onto the growing body of code that made up Firefox. He finished a serviceable beta version just ahead of last summer's rash of IE attacks, setting the stage for Firefox's explosive debut.

Ross vows he has no problem with Microsoft. "If IE worked," he says, sitting at a wobbly café table in Key Biscayne, Florida, during a quick trip to see his family in November, "I wouldn't be against it."

Whatever their motivations, Ross and Goodger have been swept up in anti-Microsoft sentiment. All the attention has been a lot to deal with for a talented but young pair of coders trying to figure out what to do with the rest of their lives.

Goodger has gone from low-profile programmer to internationally beloved code fu master with a crush of job offers. To get his head sorted out, Goodger set off in December for a "mind-clearing" drive from Silicon Valley to Seattle along the Pacific Coast Highway in his beloved Caribbean blue Infiniti G35 coupe. "It's my way of resetting the brain," Goodger says. "I like to go on long drives during the transitions between big projects. If you don't take a good break, you can crash and burn."

When he returned from the open road, Goodger declared he'd stay with the Mozilla Foundation. He has already posted the development roadmap for Firefox 2.0, beginning with version 1.1, codenamed Deer Park and scheduled for release in March.

Ross' career focus is only slightly steadier than the average sophomore's. He's definitely going to do a startup. It could launch in three months and make money by charging for online Firefox support. Or maybe it'll go live in five months and sell Firefox extensions that connect social-networking sites (or render them obsolete). He wants to write screenplays. He'll probably stay involved in Firefox, depending on how much time is left after school and the startup. He might have to drop out of Stanford. He'll definitely retain the role of freelance engineering firebrand.

On November 18, nine days after the Firefox 1.0 release, Netscape announced that it was working on a new browser based on Firefox. On his blog, Ross had some tart words for the company that inspired him to start writing code. "You have a history of making unspeakably inane decisions, of waffling when the iron is hot, and of completely abusing your few remaining customers," Ross wrote. "We went off and created Firefox. In fact, we then offered you Firefox and you made another poor decision - perhaps your worst yet - in rejecting it. By all rights, a company with this record should have been relegated to the Silicon Valley recycle bin years ago. Please don't miss this final chance at redemption; deliver what your users want."

The message in Ross' rant was directed at Netscape, but it's just as relevant to Microsoft. If Gates & Co. continue to ignore both the pain of IE users and the lessons in Firefox's advance, they could find Internet Explorer on the scrap heap - next to Netscape.
Contributing editor Josh McHugh (josh@wiredmag.com) wrote about craigslist founder Craig Newmark in issue 12.09.

Wednesday, January 26, 2005

Education secretary decries PBS cartoon's lesbian content

Jan. 26, 2005, 12:02AM
Education secretary decries PBS cartoon's lesbian content
By BEN FELLER
Associated Press

WASHINGTON - The nation's new education secretary denounced PBS on Tuesday for spending public money on a cartoon with lesbian characters, saying many parents would not want children exposed to such lifestyles.

The not-yet-aired episode of Postcards From Buster shows the title character, an animated bunny named Buster, on a trip to Vermont — a state known for recognizing same-sex civil unions. The episode features two lesbian couples, although the focus is on farm life and maple sugaring.

A PBS spokeswoman said late Tuesday that the nonprofit network has decided not to distribute the episode, called Sugartime!, to its 349 stations. Buster airs at 3 p.m. weekdays on KUHT-Channel 8.

The spokeswoman said the Education Department's objections were not a factor in that decision. "Ultimately, our decision was based on the fact that we recognize this is a sensitive issue, and we wanted to make sure that parents had an opportunity to introduce this subject to their children in their own time," said Lea Sloan, vice president of media relations at PBS.

Education Secretary Margaret Spellings said the episode does not fulfill the intent Congress had in mind for programming. By law, she said, any funded shows must give top attention to "research-based educational objectives, content and materials."

Bloggers: Just What Are the Rules?

When Bloggers Make News
As Their Clout Increases,
Web Diarists Are Asking:
Just What Are the Rules?

By JESSICA MINTZ
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
January 21, 2005; Page B1

Christopher Frankonis, like many bloggers, first began writing on his Web site about whatever popped into his head -- what kind of day he was having, the craziness of Oregon weather. Sometimes, he would comment on a news story that caught his attention, and provide readers with a link to the story.

Then, two years ago, he launched the Portland Communique, a blog that combines first-hand reporting, opinion, and links to articles about Portland news and politics, from mayoral races to neighborhood meetings. In essence, he became a one-man newspaper with about 400 readers a day. Although he had no formal journalism background, he began thinking of himself as a journalist.

Bloggers such as Mr. Frankonis are finally moving from the alleys and side streets of the Internet into the mainstream. And as their visibility and clout increases, some are asking: what are the rules of the road? There is no exam to pass or society to join to become a blogger -- anybody can set up a "Web log" to publish his or her ideas -- and at last count, an estimated eight million people in the U.S. are doing so, writing on everything from pets to porn. Blogs run the gamut from news and political commentary to hobbies to highly personalized attacks on fellow bloggers. Most blogs let readers post their own comments, which inevitably attract still more, which sometimes devolve into name-calling, all in the span of an afternoon.

The audience for such alternative media is growing rapidly. The number of Americans reading blogs jumped 58% in 2004 to an estimated 32 million people, according to a Pew Internet and American Life Project, with about 11 million looking to political blogs for news during the presidential campaign.

And blogs are increasingly having an impact: bloggers first exposed many of the flaws in CBS's "60 Minutes" episode about President Bush's National Guard service. Blogs, among others, widely disseminated premature exit poll results that led many to believe John Kerry was winning the presidential election for much of Election Day. Bloggers who were paid by people they wrote about have sparked some controversies. In the midst of the fray, bloggers are starting to debate what kinds of ethical responsibilities they have to readers, and standards that might enhance their credibility.

At Harvard University this weekend, a small group of journalists, bloggers and media thinkers are gathering in a conference, "Blogging, Journalism & Credibility" to hash out some of these issues, and kick around the idea of a blogging code of ethics. Should bloggers disclose their sources of income? Do journalists who also blog face conflicting standards?

As conference organizers quickly realized, everything is up for debate. When they posted what sounds like a simple disclaimer for discussion -- "Just because we link to it does not mean we endorse it" -- there were immediate objections.

"Yes, actually, it does," writes a reader called Spinnaker. Another, called Ahem, writes, "Wonderful. What a great precedent for a conference on 'credibility.' " And, "It really isn't necessary for everything in the world to be invented by Harvard in order for there to be patterns, purpose, objectives, ethics and rules," writes GWPDA. The debate dissolved into a name-calling free-for-all. But the point was made: Bloggers are a feisty and independent lot and are not necessarily going to accept traditional dictates meekly.

"Many would say, who are you to tell those in the blogosphere how to behave when mainstream media screws up so significantly and regularly?" says Bob Steele of the Poynter Institute, who helped develop a widely accepted code of ethics and principles for journalists. Still, he says: "Mainstream journalism is imperfect, but a lot of appropriate standards can and should be applied to new forms of communicating."

Some bloggers don't want to be limited to the traditional notions of journalism. "Bloggers should reject the traditional idea of objectivity," says Mickey Kaus, a former New Republic and Newsweek writer whose blog Kausfiles appears on Slate.com. "One of the virtues of blogging is that it's not subject to the professional and bureaucratic restrictions of big media." Mr. Kaus says a formal code isn't needed -- just honesty. He adds: "The point of blogging is to say what you actually think -- opinion, not the traditional ideal of journalism."

Indeed, many bloggers see the blogosphere -- a term some find ridiculous, by the way -- as a vast, open forum in which many perspectives can coexist to create an overall picture that's more accurate than the mainstream media.

But even bloggers who are purporting to give readers just different versions of the news are imparting their own spin, which is the nature of blogging.

"I keep coming back to the idea of personal integrity," says Jeff Jarvis, a blogger at Buzzmachine.com. "It's relevant for us to tell people where we come from, so you can then judge us," he says. "The fact of how I feel about Howard Stern is relevant when I go around defending him. It's fine for people to know that I'm a fan of his."

The same goes for disclosing who pays your salary or funds your Web site's operating costs. "The audience should be able to come to your blog and assume that you're not on the take," says Jason McCabe Calacanis, co-founder of Weblogs Inc., which publishes Autoblog.com and Engadget.com. He holds the 45 bloggers that work for him to "old-school" standards: no junkets, no gifts, no review products.

Some bloggers argue that the nature of the medium makes it self-policing. Unlike TV viewers and newspaper readers, blog readers can and do respond instantaneously, especially when they see an inaccuracy. "When I make a mistake, people jump on me like white blood cells on a germ. If I don't correct it, my reputation's going to suffer," says Mr. Jarvis.

While sometimes shocking in its vitriol, the instant feedback from readers keeps bloggers accountable, says Michelle Malkin, a conservative blogger and syndicated columnist who often gets e-mails asking whether she's getting paid by the Bush administration. (The answer is no.) "When you hit that little publish button and something goes up, you know that literally millions of eyeballs around the world are there to parse it," and deconstruct every word. "It certainly raises the stakes," she says.

And it's these same readers who must make their own judgments, some say. "A good thing about blogging is it has sort of forced readers' antenna for bull- to be a little more fine," says Ana Marie Cox, who writes Wonkette.com, a political satire and gossip site. "It lies upon the intelligent reader ... to decide whether they trust what they're reading. It's what they should be doing with newspapers as well."

But the nature of the medium also allows rumors and falsehoods and ad hominem attacks to be spread with lightning speed. "Rumors are always more fun than the truth," says Rebecca Blood, author of "The Weblog Handbook: Practical Advice on Creating and Maintaining Your Blog." "I think people do scandal-monger and deal in rumor, especially the political advocates."

Like reporters, bloggers can be sued for libel or defamation charges, and they are also protected by the First Amendment. In one case, former U.S. Sen. James G. Abourezk is suing a pair of Web writers in their 20s for libel in U.S. District Court in Sioux Falls, S.D. The writers, Michael Marino and Ben Marino Jr. of Pennsylvania, posted Mr. Abourezk's name in a list of traitors on their ProBush.com Web site. A spokesman for the writers said the list is a parody and thus protected by the First Amendment.

In another case, Apple Computer Inc. has brought a lawsuit against the owner of a Web site run by a Harvard student, Nicholas Ciarelli, called ThinkSecret.com for allegedly revealing trade secrets. An attorney for Mr. Ciarelli said that holding a Web writer accountable for how his source obtained information would have a chilling effect on free speech.

Jay Rosen, the New York University Journalism Department chairman who will kick off the conference, says that as bloggers move away from opinion writing and become a what he calls "citizen-journalists," they will inevitably struggle with the same ethics questions that traditional media did. "The blogger system is necessarily evolving and changing and will go through crises and problems and periods of invention, because it's new," he says.

The dictates of capitalism will no doubt begin affecting which blogs survive and which don't, but not yet. "Right now the currency is readership and respect, not money," says Glenn Reynolds, a law professor at the University of Tennessee who writes Instapundit.com, a well-read blog. "I don't think you can start reading a blog and immediately know who to trust." That relationship is built over time. Mr. Reynolds says he wouldn't knowingly publish or link to something false -- but as one guy at a computer, there's only so much fact-checking he can do.

All the way back in 2002, Rebecca Blood advised bloggers to disclose their conflicts of interest, publish only what they believe to be true, and correct mistakes publicly. Her counsel to readers? Follow the same rules as one would walking down the street: "Don't make eye contact with someone who seems crazy."

Justices Refuse to Consider Law Banning Gay Adoption

January 11, 2005
Justices Refuse to Consider Law Banning Gay Adoption
By LINDA GREENHOUSE

WASHINGTON, Jan. 10 - The Supreme Court refused on Monday to hear a challenge to a Florida law that prohibits gay men and lesbians from adopting children.

Florida's is the only such statute in the country, and the prohibition is the only categorical adoption ban on the state's books. Florida evaluates adoption applications from all other would-be adoptive parents, including those who have failed at previous adoptions and those with a history of drug abuse or domestic violence, on a case-by-case basis.

Three gay men and the children they have raised in long-term foster care challenged the statute in a lawsuit filed four years before the Supreme Court, in Lawrence v. Texas, invalidated that state's criminal sodomy law in a landmark gay-rights ruling.

The Florida plaintiffs had lost their case in Federal District Court in Key West and had already filed their briefs with the federal appeals court in Atlanta when the Lawrence decision was issued in June 2003. Their lawyers then filed supplemental briefs arguing that the Texas decision meant that Florida's law should also fall, as an expression of anti-gay sentiment that the Supreme Court had ruled could not be a basis for public policy.

But a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit disagreed, ruling last January that the Lawrence decision did not refute "the accumulated wisdom of several millennia of human experience" that the "optimal family structure" in which to raise children was one with a mother and father married to each other.

The appeals court then deadlocked 6 to 6 on whether the full court should rehear the case. The rehearing request failed because a rehearing requires a majority vote. One of the judges voting against rehearing the case was William H. Pryor Jr., who was named to the appeals court as a temporary recess appointment by President Bush during an 11-day Congressional recess last February. Had Judge Pryor not participated, the appeals court would have reconsidered the case.

The validity of the Pryor appointment - whether the president's constitutional authority to make appointments "during the recess of the Senate" to positions ordinarily requiring Senate confirmation applies to such short recesses - is the subject of a separate case that has been appealed to the Supreme Court.

Although Florida's adoption law had contained a preference for married couples, the state repealed that provision in 2003. One-quarter of the adoptions in the state are by single people.

The state Legislature voted to prohibit adoptions by gays in 1977, in the midst of a campaign led by the entertainer Anita Bryant to repeal a gay-rights ordinance adopted by Dade County. The state senator who sponsored the adoption measure, Curtis Peterson, said at the time that its purpose was to send a message to the gay community that "we're really tired of you" and "we wish you'd go back into the closet."

Florida permits gay men and lesbians to be foster parents. The lead plaintiff in the case, Steven Lofton, is a licensed foster parent who has taken in eight children with H.I.V. or AIDS, winning an award as the outstanding foster parent of the year from the agency that placed the children in the home he has shared for 20 years with his partner, Roger Croteau. The boy identified in the case as John Doe, now 13, has been with the couple since infancy.

The Supreme Court made no comment Monday in turning down the case, Lofton v. Secretary of the Florida Department of Children and Families, No. 04-478. The justices may have decided to permit the Lawrence decision to play out in different contexts in various courts before taking up the gay rights issue once again.

Matthew A. Coles, director of the Lesbian and Gay Rights Project of the American Civil Liberties Union, which represented the plaintiffs, said in an interview that the fact that the Florida law was unique might have limited the court's interest in the case.

Last month in Arkansas, in another suit brought by the A.C.L.U., a state trial judge struck down a law that prohibits placing foster children in a household with a gay adult. Arkansas has announced that it will appeal the ruling. Mr. Coles said the Arkansas case might be the next to reach the Supreme Court.

In another Supreme Court development on Monday, lawyers for Zacarias Moussaoui, the only person charged in an American court with conspiring in the Sept. 11 attacks, filed an appeal of a ruling last April that restored the government's right to seek the death penalty while at the same time limiting Mr. Moussaoui's right to seek testimony from captured members of Al Qaeda who have told interrogators that he had nothing to do with the plot.

A federal district judge, Leonie V. Brinkema, ruled in 2003 that without giving Mr. Moussaoui access to favorable witnesses, the government could not seek the death penalty. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in Richmond, overturned that decision last April, holding that Mr. Moussaoui's right to favorable testimony could be preserved through written summaries rather than direct access to the witnesses, who are being held overseas as enemy combatants.

The Supreme Court appeal, Moussaoui v. United States, was filed under seal because the record contains classified material. One of the lawyers for Mr. Moussaoui, Edward B. MacMahon Jr., described the case as one that concerns "the most fundamental rights of a criminal defendant to mount a defense." The court is expected to make a public version of the petition available next week.

Soccer's Gold Cup coming to Reliant Stadium

Jan. 25, 2005, 7:47PM

Soccer's Gold Cup coming to Reliant Stadium
By JOHN P. LOPEZ
Copyright 2005 Houston Chronicle

Houston's Reliant Stadium will play host this July to the premier soccer event leading up to the 2006 World Cup, the CONCACAF Gold Cup finals.

An official announcement of Gold Cup finals sites is expected Wednesday. The Gold Cup will feature the U.S. men's national team, which currently is in the final qualifying stage for the 2006 World Cup, which will be held in Germany.

Among the U.S. players likely to participate are some of the game's biggest stars, including Landon Donovan, DaMarcus Beasley, Claudio Reyna, Clint Mathis and goalkeepers Kasey Keller and Brad Freidel.

A match between the United States and Mexico -- bitter rivals -- is highly likely in the Gold Cup. In a 2002 World Cup elimination game between the teams, Team USA staged a 2-0 win over Mexico, earning a first-ever trip to the World Cup quarterfinals.

Mexico, the defending 2003 Gold Cup champions, and Team USA own automatic bids into the tournament based on world rankings and past Gold Cup results.

Other national teams in the 12-team Confederation of North American, Central American and Caribbean nations tournament likely would include world notables such as Colombia, Costa Rica, Trinidad and Tobago, Honduras, Jamaica, Canada and Guatemala.

Two national teams from outside CONCACAF also are invited to the Gold Cup. In recent Gold Cup tournaments, one of those teams has been world power Brazil.

Considered the showpiece event for this International Soccer Federation (FIFA) region, the biannual tournament will take on added significance this year as national teams prepare for the 2006 World Cup.

As it prepares for World Cup finals qualifying, the U.S. men's national team has upcoming games against Trinidad and Tobago in Port-of-Spain, Trinidad on Feb. 9, and a highly anticipated rematch with Mexico on March 26 at Estadio Azteca in Mexico City.

The Gold Cup event will be without question the biggest in a string of world-class events that Reliant and Soccer United Marketing has brought to Houston, including the recently completed InterLiga final-four and the 2003 USA-Mexico "friendly," which drew more than 65,000 fans to Reliant Stadium.

Fire destroys historic church near downtown

Jan. 24, 2005, 12:44PM
Fire destroys historic church near downtown
By PEGGY O'HARE
Copyright 2005 Houston Chronicle

A historic church was destroyed by fire early this morning, tying up Houston fire crews for hours as they worked to douse the flames.

The blaze gutted the Bethel Baptist Church, built in the 1920s at Andrews and Crosby streets. Smoke from the fire was still visible to motorists driving on the Pierce Elevated late this morning.

The fire broke out around 5 a.m. No injuries were reported. The church has been vacant for several years, said Houston Fire Department District Chief Tommy Dowdy.

Arson investigators were unable to determine what started the fire, and the burned building is too unstable for them to enter safely, Dowdy said. Fire crews will tear the building down, and the fire's cause likely will remain undetermined, he said.

Bush protestors stage march to City Hall



Jan. 22, 2005, 7:12PM

Bush protestors stage march to City Hall
By ERIC BERGER
Copyright 2005 Houston Chronicle

They marched. They yelled. And they carried signs with such slogans as: "Bush lied, thousands died."

Days after the inauguration of President Bush for a second term, more than 100 protesters marched in downtown Houston to let the world know that even on Bush's home turf some were resisting his administration.

Perhaps Aswad Walker, an instructor in the University of Houston African American Studies program and pastor of Houston's Shrine of the Black Madonna, best summed up the feelings of the angry protestors:

"We've got some joker who stole the White House two times who is now trying to tell us how to live our lives."

Social change was the order of the day: ending the war in Iraq, stopping racial intolerance, repealing the Patriot Act, defending women's reproductive rights and ending environmental harm were all among the calls.

The march, organized by a coalition of groups including the Harris County Green Party, Progressive Workers Organizing Committee and Latinos Por La Paz, went from Market Square to City Hall.

Along the way they were needled by about a dozen Bush supporters affiliated with a group called Protest Warrior, which counters left-thinking gatherings.

"Most of us are not protestors by nature," said Julie Braverman, a Sugar Land resident who was taking a short break from telling the protestors that Saddam Hussein killed 3 million of his own people.

"So all of this seems a little ludicrous to us. But we just feel like we can't let them get away with it."

Shortly afterward the protest had its only mildly violent moment. A line of the protestors began marching toward the Bush supporters, backing them into the street and oncoming traffic. Horns honked as the traffic stopped. Soon Houston police arrived and the march proceeded peacefully.

If the march was peaceful, the rhetoric was much more spirited.

"Bush was never, never supposed to occupy the presidency," said Cristobal Hinojosa, of the group Mexicanos en Accion. "But he's occupying the presidency just like the troops are occupying Iraq -- with no reason. We are not going to bend our heads to power. We are going to continue to fight for what is right."

Among the rallyers were half a dozen young men and women dressed in black. They carried a banner stating: "Whoever they vote for, we are ungovernable."


Marco Sasia for The New York Times
Lingotto, formerly a factory, will hold the Winter Olympics ice skating events next year.


Marco Sasia for The New York Times
Mole Antonelliana's spire.


Marco Sasia for The New York Times
Al Bicerin is one of the city's historic cafes.


The New York Times
Map of Turin. Numbers on this map correspond to numbers in the article.

January 23, 2005
GOING TO
Turin
By ERIC SYLVERS

Why Go Now

Because in 2006, when friends are bragging about going to Turin for the Winter Olympics, you can say: "Oh, I went there last year. You really must check out this great focacceria on the Via Perrone."

Detractors say Turin is Calvinistic and reserved. The locals nod in agreement mostly because they want to distinguish themselves from fashion-obsessed Milan, 90 miles to the east. Do not be fooled. Turin is full of life, and like their compatriots to the south, its citizens spend their fair share of time congregating in numerous squares, strolling through the heart of town or chatting in a cafe.

Turin is transforming itself from a faded industrial powerhouse (home to Fiat) into a city capable of impressing the world as host to the 2006 Winter Olympics. Val di Susa and Val Chisone, site of the skiing events, are a 90-minute drive from Turin - too far to make the city an après-ski destination, but close enough to make a day trip practically mandatory.

Where to Stay

The nicest places are around the Piazza Vittorio Veneto, the Piazza San Carlo or in the Quadrilatero Romano.

Just a step from the Piazza Vittorio Veneto, the (1) Casa Marga, at Via Bava, 1 Bis, (39-011) 883-892, offers Italian hospitality at budget prices. Margareta Corongiu rents out the two front rooms of her house and treats you like family. One room has a full-size bed in a loft and a sofa bed (twin) below; the other has a twin bed. Both rooms, clean and simple, have private baths. Breakfast, often with jam and yogurt made by Margareta, is included. The double is $87, at $1.34 to the euro (discounts for stay of four days or more).

Although the lobby of the (2) Hotel Dogana Vecchia, Via Corte d'Appello, 4, (39-011) 436-6752, with its vaulted ceiling, white columns and elaborate glass chandeliers, is quite a bit more regal than the rooms, this is a pleasant place to stay for the sense of the city's former grandeur that it provides. Illustrious former guests are said to have included Verdi, Mozart and Napoleon. Doubles: $140 to $160.

(3) Le Meridien Lingotto Art & Tech, Via Nizza, 262, (39-011) 664-2000 or (800) 543-4300, is part of a former Fiat factory converted by the architect Renzo Piano into a complex with two hotels, a conference center, museum and shopping area. It is a few miles south of the main train station and can be reached by tram or taxi. Standard rooms - simply furnished, with cherrywood paneling and sleek desks - are $536 (suites, $1,340), with a special weekend rate of $200.

Where to Eat

(4) Porto di Savona, Piazza Vittorio Veneto, 2, (39-011) 817-3500, serves reasonably priced food in a casual, homey atmosphere. The intimate setting - several small rooms with wood paneling and photos of Turin's glory years as Savoy's capital - and general lack of tourists make this a good place to sample local specialties such as agnolotti (raviolilike pasta filled with beef or lamb), bollito misto (a variety of boiled meats) and trout in a hazelnut sauce. A three-course dinner for two (without wine) costs $80.

Alessandro Boglione, the head chef at (5) AB+, Via della Basilica, 13, (39-011) 439-0618, defines his creations as modern Mediterranean. Recent dishes have included a warm, creamy broccoli soup with grilled squid and thyme. Nothing is dull and everything is utterly fresh. AB+ has been open only since mid-October, but word is spreading fast, making reservations a necessity to get a table alongside the eclectic clientele that includes some of Turin's most prominent figures. The lighting is dim and the tables are far enough apart to allow some privacy. Two people can eat their fill for $100 before tacking on the wine, which runs the gamut all the way to $135 bottles of Barolo. Open for dinner only; closed Sunday.

Pizza by the slice is plentiful around town, and some of the best is at the (6) (7) Antica Focacceria Genovese, at Via Perrone, 2, and Via San Domenico, 24. You will find specialties from Liguria, Piedmont's southern neighbor, such as farinata (a chickpea flat bread). About $2 a slice.

Turin's historic cafes, some of which date back more than 200 years, are wonderful for people-watching or just plain resting. (8) Al Bicerin, Piazza della Consolata, 5, is near the market in Porta Palazzo, making it an ideal place to fuel up before the shopping trip or to recompose afterward. The specialty is the bicerin ($5.35), a calorie bomb made with coffee, chocolate and cream, definitely worth a stop. Closed Wednesday.

(9) At Caffè Torino, Piazza San Carlo, 204, if you order one sweet, the tuxedo-clad waiters bring you a selection of several similar ones (but you are charged only for the ones you eat). A regal winding staircase and marble fireplaces may make you want to sit and sip, but just be aware that a cappuccino served at the table ($6) costs three times what it does at the bar.

What to Do During the Day

Be sure to explore the Via Garibaldi (a milelong pedestrian mall) and the Via Po (one of the best examples of the city's arcaded thoroughfares and a local favorite for its book stalls, elegant stores and cafes), but also some of the tiny back streets in the Quadrilatero Romano.

The blockbuster exhibition "Impressionists and the Snow" runs until April 25 at (10) Promotrice delle Belle Arti, Via Balsamo Crivelli, 11, in the Parco del Valentino, and includes paintings by Monet, Manet, Gauguin, Pissarro and Munch - on loan from museums and collections around the world. Try going early (doors open at 9 a.m.) or at lunch to avoid the biggest crowds. Information: (39-0438) 221-306. Admission $13.40.

The (11) Mole Antonelliana, a stunning structure that stands out in Turin's mostly uniform skyline, contains the National Museum of Cinema, Via Montebello, 20, (39-011) 812-5658, [url]www.museonazionaledelcinema.org.[/url] When construction began in the 1860's, the Mole was intended to become a synagogue. Now it contains props, sets, posters and scripts tracing the development of moviemaking. Ride the glass elevator to the lookout platform, from where you can gaze at the nearby Alps. Admission $7; with elevator ticket, $9.10. The museum is closed Monday.

The (12) Egyptian Museum, Via Accademia delle Scienze, 6, (39-011) 561-7776, contains artifacts spanning virtually the entire history of Egyptian culture, though a lack of English panels beyond the first rooms can be disorienting; $8.70. Closed Monday.

What to Do at Night

(13) Teatro Regio, Piazza Castello, 215, [url]www.teatroregio.torino.it[/url] (Italian only), (39-011) 8815-557 (information) or (39-011) 8815-241 (tickets), the city's opera house, is presenting "Don Giovanni" at the end of January and early February, followed in March by "Il Trovatore." Tickets run from $23 to $205.

To rub elbows with an eclectic mix of young, hip locals, try the new AB+ (downstairs from the restaurant with the same name, above). Live music a few nights a week, when the large crowd gets larger. No cover. Closed Sunday and Monday.

Below street level on both sides of the Ponte Vittorio Emanuele you will find lots of bars and dance places. The area, known as I Murazzi, slows down in the winter, but there is always some sign of life, including at the

(14) Beach, a disco north of the bridge ([url]www.thebeachtorino.it[/url]), and (15) Giancarlo, a bar south of the bridge that attracts Turin's alternative crowd. Things are generally at their liveliest from 11 p.m. to 2 a.m.

Where to Shop

The Via Garibaldi has boutiques, while the Via Roma has the more famous fashion names. For a great selection of local sweets such as marron glacé, try (16) Pasticceria Ghigo, Via Po, 52. Closed Tuesday and Sunday afternoon.

At the enormous daily market at the (17) Porta Palazzo, in the Piazza della Repubblica, 8 a.m. to 2 p.m. (closed Sunday), you will find fruit, vegetables and probably anything else you might be looking for, whether it's a coat hook or a frying pan. On Saturday the market spills into the surrounding streets; on the second Sunday of the month there is also an antiques market.

How to Stay Wired

Internet cafes are still rare. At (18) 1PC4You, Via Giuseppe Verdi, 20G, you can log on for $2.70 to $4 an hour.

Your First Time or 10th

Have a light breakfast of pastries and cappuccino at (19) La Drogheria, Piazza Vittorio Veneto, 18, (39-011) 812-2414, while reading one of the international newspapers on one of its relaxing couches, and then head to the nearby (20) Parco del Valentino for a meander along the Po, just as captivating with a splendidly shining sun as with fog so thick that you can't see the other side.

How to Get There

There are no nonstop flights from New York. Alitalia (about $490), Delta ($525), Lufthansa ($550) and Air France ($600) all fly to Turin with one stopover.

Getting Around

Turin's relatively small city center makes slow-paced strolling the best way to move about. But these tram lines come in handy: No. 13 cuts through the center connecting the Piazza Vittorio Veneto with the Porta Susa train station; No. 15 links Piazza Vittorio Veneto with the Porta Nuova train station; No. 16 runs a line from Parco del Valentino to Piazza Vittorio Veneto and on to Porta Palazzo. Tram fare: $1.20.

[url]http://travel2.nytimes.com/2005/01/23/travel/23goingto.html[/url]

Shadows on the Wall


The Gothic hulk on Central Park West, once a cancer hospital, then a scandal-ridden nursing home, is being reborn as a luxury condominium.

January 23, 2005
Shadows on the Wall
By JIM RASENBERGER

ON a late night in the early 1980's, Mary Beth Polasek, accompanied by her then-husband, Ted, and a friend named Charlie, ventured into the old castle on Central Park West and 106th Street. Guided by the beams of their flashlights, they creaked up the stairs to the top floor, passed through a wide hall, then entered one of the turrets. The circular room was vast and empty, and littered with chunks of plaster. The high conical roof, damaged years earlier in a fire, gaped open to the elements and the dim stars.

Long ago, the building had been the notorious Towers Nursing Home, and long before that, the renowned New York Cancer Hospital. Now it was an abandoned ruin. Everyone in the neighborhood simply called it "the castle" because its gray stone walls, five turrets and gabled dormers all gave it the countenance of a Gothic fortress. Like any castle worthy of the name, this one was gloomy and forbidding. Stray cats slinked through the weeds and rubbish. Next door, the Castle Hotel ran a brisk trade in prostitution and crack.

Ms. Polasek should have been afraid that night, but she was not. "I've seen a lot of ghosts since then," she said recently. "But I didn't see any that night. I wasn't spooked. We were young and foolish. We were crazy, happy kids."

Before leaving, Ms. Polasek rescued a few discarded artifacts. In one room, she came upon an "unspeakably lovely" antique wooden toilet. In another, she discovered sepia-stained photographs of men and women spilling out of several open suitcases. Ms. Polasek, an artist, took the photographs home and set them into a collage. "They must be the people who lived there," she said. "I wanted to save them."

Only later did it occur to her that their spirits might have been present the night she entered the castle. Or, more to the point, that they are still there today, looking down in shock from their spectral perches as 455 Central Park West - as the castle was recently christened - is reborn as a luxury condominium.

Ms. Polasek will not be among those moving in. "As much as I would love to have $7 million for an apartment," she said, "I would never want to live in a building that I think is probably haunted."

This sentiment is shared by many who have lived near the castle through its long demise and, now, its astonishing transformation. Whether they believe the castle is literally haunted by the dead or only figuratively haunted by the past, many Manhattan Valley residents find its restoration strangely unsettling, not to mention utterly incongruous with the dilapidated ruin they came to know and even love.

Next month, with most of the units in its new adjoining 26-story high-rise already taken, 17 apartments in the landmark castle will be finished and ready for occupancy. Priced from $3.5 million to $7 million, the apartments will feature cavernous circular living rooms with lofty ceilings and splendid park views, and will include such amenities as a spa, an indoor lap pool, and 24-hour concierge service. As the sales brochure puts it, residents will be bathed in "surpassing opulence" and "timeless elegance," while "reverently preserved architectural details echo a grander age."

Not to be heard among the echoes is a word about the actual past of the building. The omission is slightly ludicrous but entirely predictable. As anyone who has lived in New York longer than a few weeks knows, the past is easily discarded in this city. Buildings change, their contents shift, and eventually just about everybody who knew what was once where forgets or dies.

This truth is hard enough to accept when it applies to a favorite corner restaurant; harder still when it applies to a building with a troubling past. Surely such buildings have earned themselves immunity from forgetfulness.

In fact, though, they have not. Addresses that once seared themselves into the city's consciousness - the Kew Gardens foyer where Kitty Genovese was slain by a psychopath in 1964; the Greenwich Village brownstone where Joel Steinberg beat his daughter and wife in the 1980's - are forgotten. The Octagon Tower on Roosevelt Island, once home of the forlorn New York City Lunatics Asylum, is about to be incorporated into a mixed-income housing development. The former Asch Building near Washington Square, where 146 people perished in the 1911 Triangle Waist Company fire, now thrives as a biology building at New York University.

It's a good bet that most New Yorkers could not identify that building if they walked right past it, a memory lapse that would have been unthinkable to anyone who lived here in 1911 - nearly as unthinkable as the possibility that future New Yorkers will be unable to identify the spot where the World Trade Center once stood.

Morphine and Champagne

Nothing as harrowing as the Triangle fire ever occurred at 455 Central Park West, but the building has endured a good deal of misfortune. When the New York Cancer Hospital was founded in the 1880's, cancer was widely considered incurable, as well as contagious and shameful. The hospital was the country's first to devote itself exclusively to the care of cancer patients, and every effort was made to build a state-of-the-art facility equal to the task.

Inspired as much by modern medical theory as by 16th-century French chateaux, the architect Charles Haight's round towers were designed to deter germs and dirt from accumulating in sharp corners. An airshaft running vertically through the center of each tower - the very latest in 19th-century ventilation technology - prevented air from stagnating in the wards. Altogether, commended The New York Times in 1888, the features marked "a new departure in hospital construction and make this admirable structure a model of its kind."

For all the purified air, tragedy seeped quickly into the hospital's thick walls. One of its chief benefactors, Elizabeth Hamilton Cullum, died of uterine cancer within months of laying the cornerstone. Another, Charlotte Augusta Astor (she and her husband, John Jacob Astor III, donated most of the money) died of cancer a week after the hospital opened in December 1887, missing her chance to be cured.

Not that she could have been cured. Treatment for cancer was mostly palliative in those days. Many patients who came to West 106th came, in effect, to die, assuaged by morphine, whiskey and Champagne. (Tellingly, the hospital spent more on alcoholic beverages than on medical supplies.) Other forms of relief included carriage rides in Central Park and Sunday services in the hospital's Chapel of St. Elizabeth of Hungary, patron saint of the suffering.

Largely because cancer remained so deadly, the hospital soon ran into money troubles. It came to be known as "the Bastille," a place to be feared and avoided by patients and patrons. In 1899, in an effort to attract more of both, administrators of the beleaguered hospital changed its name to the General Memorial Hospital for the Treatment of Cancer and Allied Diseases.

The new name heralded a golden age for the hospital - a positively glowing age, in fact. Using radium, the radioactive material discovered in 1898 by Marie and Pierre Curie, doctors at Memorial pioneered new techniques to burn away cancers with X-rays. By 1920, Memorial was among the world's leading cancer hospitals. It was also the country's single largest repository of radium, holding just shy of four grams (valued at $400,000) in a brick and steel vault. The following year, Madame Curie herself came to West 106th Street to admire the hospital's advancements.

In retrospect, early radiation treatments were often worse than the disease they were meant to cure. Radiation caused severe burns and, in some cases, additional cancers. There may have been cause for hope at West 106th Street, but there was no end to suffering, a suffering made all the more dreadful by the vision, through the windows, of a smokestack to the west of the main building. Back there was the crematorium.

Only after Memorial moved out of the building to the East Side of Manhattan (where it expanded into the present day Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center) did life at the castle reach its full measure of dreadfulness. In 1955, the building became the Towers Nursing Home, the largest and most infamous member of a nursing home empire run by Bernard Bergman and his family. By the early 1970's, the Towers was at the center of state and federal investigations into Medicaid fraud and other crimes.

In the meantime, the home's elderly charges went neglected. A Times reporter visiting in 1974 noted that patients looked bleary-eyed and stupefied. Floors were filthy, and a "pervasive odor" tainted the air. Patients testified to "atrocious conditions," including inadequate heat, pest infestations and physical abuse.

The nursing home was finally closed in 1974. There was talk of tearing it down, but in 1976, the Landmarks Preservation Commission designated the building a landmark, thereby condemning it not to the wrecking ball but to slow death by decrepitude.

Where Beasts Were Born (on Film)

It was during this third, and seemingly terminal, stage of the castle's life that many Manhattan Valley residents first came to know it. Even those who never dared set foot in the place felt its gravitational pull. Michael Kelly, a local filmmaker, often trained his camera on the building for hours at a time, transfixed. Gary Dennis, now owner of a neighborhood video store, recalls sneaking out at lunch from Public School 145 to surveil the castle with his friends.

"We never got real close," Mr. Dennis said. "It was too scary."

Among Mr. Dennis's current wares is a 1982 movie entitled "Q: The Winged Serpent." The plot concerns a dragonlike beast that lives atop the Chrysler Building and preys on Manhattanites. In the last shot, after the beast has been slain and order restored, the camera pans down 106th Street, into a burnt-out turret of the castle, then closes in on a giant egg hidden inside the ruin. The castle was exactly the sort of place you'd expect to find the giant egg of a man-eating serpent.

Years passed, and trees grew from the mortar between the bricks. Mysterious fires lit the roof, graffiti blemished the walls. But as it crumbled, its allure grew. Martha Flach, a graduate student at Columbia in the early 90's, was intrigued enough to devote her master's thesis to the building. The project required frequent excursions to what was then a dicey neighborhood.

"I'd go to photograph it, and the police would see this skinny white girl and tell me to be careful," said Ms. Flach, who now works for the World Monuments Fund. "But the people who lived around there, even the drug dealers and the prostitutes, were always coming up to me to ask me questions about it. They were fascinated."

Occasionally, a developer expressed interest in the property, most promisingly Ian Schrager, the hotel impresario, who bought it in the late 1980's. But inevitably, the deals fell through, and the decay continued.

"We used to stand in the dog park on top of the hill, and people would play this game," Mr. Kelly said. "We called it the Castle Fantasy Game. Given unlimited resources, what would you do with the building?"

A condo might not have been high on anyone's fantasy list, but it was the solution favored by Daniel McLean, the Chicago developer who purchased the property in 2000. He would have many opportunities to regret his decision. No sooner had he secured financing than 9/11 struck, causing the bank to withdraw its loan. After resuming construction a year later, he fired the superintendent, who exacted revenge by reporting the building for health code violations.

"Six weeks into the deal he's calling the city telling them we have dead birds inside and West Nile virus," Mr. McLean said. "It just for some reason was the kind of building that anything that could go wrong, went wrong."

The hardest challenge may be yet to come. Trying to entice very wealthy buyers to live above West 96th Street flies in the face of conventional real estate wisdom. Then there is the building's macabre past. "We obviously don't dwell on that part of the history," Mr. McLean acknowledged. "We don't go into the crematorium part."

At least one buyer has no trouble accepting either the building's location or its history. Daniel Lufkin, founding partner of the securities firm Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, has bought what may be the most spectacular apartment in the complex, if not the city: the former Chapel of St. Elizabeth of Hungary, now a duplex with high arched windows and original wooden beams.

Mr. Lufkin is aware of the building's past, but said it did nothing to dampen his or his wife's ardor. "It could have been a prison and we'd have been interested," he said. "The history is fascinating, but what's really fascinating is the building itself." Mr. Lufkin is convinced that, after a year or so, other buyers will flock in behind. "Everybody and his brother will be trying to move in."

Renovated, Then Resurrected

He may be right, and there, in a nutshell, is the moral of the tale. One person's haunted castle is another's park-vu condo. A building's history, however gripping or traumatic, is not lapidary, not even when posted on a plaque. That buildings find new reasons for being is not in itself a bad thing.

"You go to Rome, you go to Paris, you go to any old city, buildings keep being reused," said Françoise Bollack, an architect and historic preservationist who has studied the castle. "And some of them have really terrible pasts." Formerly Fascist monoliths in Berlin, she points out, are filled with ghosts far less friendly than any likely to haunt the old castle on Central Park West.

Old buildings are there to tell us who we were. When their stories are odd or chilling, all the more reason to listen. The trick, Ms. Bollack said, is to acknowledge a building's previous life while embracing its future. "The past should never be forgotten," she said. Still, she added, "Life goes on."

It's a paradox Ms. Polasek struggles to accept as she watches the neighborhood she has lived in for more than 20 years change under the shadows of the castle that has so long defined it.

"They just put millions of dollars into a place that was falling apart," Ms. Polasek said. "I don't want to be judgmental. I want to try to like what has happened. I want to try to accept that nothing stays the same."

After Ms. Polasek and her husband divorced, a boyfriend persuaded her to purge some of the objects she'd gathered from the castle that night long ago; he thought they reminded her too much of her ex-husband. As she stood by, weeping, he tossed out the old things, including the exquisite toilet, an apt metaphor for flushing away the past.

The boyfriend is gone now, too. Ms. Polasek still has the photographs, though, and on a cold bright day she sat by her window, just a stone's throw from the old castle, looking down at the faces of the dead people. She wishes the castle's new tenants the best. But she is fairly certain they will be sharing the place with ghosts.

This is exactly how it should be. Those who wish to seize the day may go ahead and seize it. Those who care to see the ghosts are free to see them. In a great old building like the castle, there is room for both the living and the dead.

Jim Rasenberger is the author of "High Steel: The Daring Men Who Built the World's Greatest Skyline."

[url]http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/23/nyregion/thecity/23feat.html[/url]

A Fifth Ward success story

Jan. 23, 2005, 1:00AM
A Fifth Ward success story
Brown's president shares goals with alumni
By MARY VUONG
Copyright 2005 Houston Chronicle

Virtually every news story about Ruth J. Simmons hails her as the first African-American to preside over an Ivy League university.


The accomplishment is hardly something this down-to-earth woman, raised in East Texas and the Fifth Ward of Houston, wears on her sleeve.

In an interview, Simmons said she would like her legacy to be, simply, the "president who came along and did what was required for the time." That includes being a model to her students, pushing them to respect differences and contribute to society.

Simmons, in her fourth year leading Brown University and its nearly 7,600 students in Providence, R.I., was in Houston last week to meet local alumni.

Her goals for Brown include increasing faculty by 100 to improve course offerings and reduce class size, and improving financial aid for graduate students. The school also has instituted a need-blind admission policy for undergraduate students starting with the class of 2007.

Simmons, 59, is often asked how she has survived in academia for so long. After graduating from Dillard University in New Orleans, she earned a doctorate in Romance languages and literature at Harvard University. She established the first engineering program at a women's school as president of Smith College, and has held teaching and administrative roles elsewhere.

When Simmons was starting out, many of her friends in education were leaving the field. Some for promising possibilities, others frustrated by the lack of advancement opportunities. Then there were those who, like she did, believed education was the "greatest hope for hastening equality" — they left because they were no longer fulfilled, because the road to equality never seemed to end.

Simmons' belief, though, only strengthened.

She grew up poor, the youngest of 12 children. Her parents were sharecroppers in Grapeland who later became a factory worker and maid in the Fifth Ward. She attended a segregated Wheatley High School, and the racial climate back then — "I grew up understanding what it feels like to be diminished every day of your life," she says — made it difficult to aspire to certain professions.

"School was the only bright spot that I saw," says Simmons, who plans to retire in Houston and return to the classroom to share her experiences. "Education permits you to go anywhere."

She used to feel like an "invited guest" at Harvard until she realized she offered as much to the school as it to her. Her upbringing reminds her "that a person's economic or social standing has nothing to do with character, intelligence, personality," and she immediately connects with students on financial aid and reassures them of their right to be at Brown.

Without family, teachers and strangers supporting her college education, Simmons believes she would have remained in Houston and become a blue-collar, hard-working and earnest employee, but not a leader.

Despite her sucess, Simmons still sees herself as a product of the Fifth Ward. She freely shares her difficulties as a student, hoping to encourage those having trouble in their own classes; Simmons once struggled so much in an undergrad French class that she considered dropping it, only to go on to achieve her doctorate in the subject.

And when the interview comes to a close, she rises from her seat in a private room at the Menil Collection and wonders if she should bus the area and return the glass of water that had been served to her.

When Simmons started at Brown, "I was concentrating more on making sure I didn't fail," she says. "Now I never think about that. Once you become immersed in the job, all the things you care about come back to you."

Jeffrey Eugenides coming to Houston for reading at the Alley

Jan. 21, 2005, 1:10PM
Jeffrey Eugenides coming to Houston for reading at the Alley
By FRITZ LANHAM
Copyright 2005 Houston Chronicle

Hermaphrodites don't narrate many novels. Which perhaps is odd because, as Jeffrey Eugenides says, every good novelist is a sort of hermaphrodite, trying to get inside the heads of both men and women.
Group Discussion

An informal book-club style discussion of Jeffrey Eugenides' novels will be held 3-4 p.m. today at Brazos Bookstore, 2421 Bissonnet. Christa Forster, a poet, playwright and performer who teaches at St. John's School, will lead the discussion. Admission is free.

In Middlesex, Eugenides took up the challenge of creating a realistic hermaphroditic narrator (actually a pseudohermaphrodite, a genetic male with imperfectly developed genitalia). The result was a large-hearted multigenerational comic epic that won the Pulitzer Prize for fiction in 2003 and is one of the most admired novels of recent years.

Eugenides (pronounced yu-GIN-e-dees) will read at 7:30 p.m. Monday at the Alley Theatre in the 2004-2005 Inprint Brown Reading Series. It will be his first Texas appearance.

At its core Middlesex is the coming-of-age story of Cal — short for Calliope — Stephanides, a Greek-American kid growing up in suburban Detroit in the 1960s and '70s. But the novel ranges over eight decades, telling the story of Cal's Greek immigrant grandparents (source of Cal's wayward genes) and his parents. Everything from Prohibition-era bootlegging to the Detroit race riot of 1967 to adolescent Cal's clumsy and comic sexual awakening figures into the plot.

Middlesex was preceded by Eugenides' well-received debut novel, The Virgin Suicides. Published in 1993, it tells the story of five teenage sisters who commit suicide, and despite the grim-sounding subject matter the book manages to be both touching and comic. Director Sophia Coppola made The Virgin Suicides into a critically acclaimed movie.

Eugenides was born in Detroit in 1960 and grew up in suburban Grosse Point, Mich. As a schoolboy he studied Latin, reading Ovid (where he came across the hermaphroditic seer Tiresias) and falling under the sway of Virgil. He once said The Aeneid influenced him more than any other book, although he also cites the great Russians — Tolstoy, Nabokov — and American novelists Saul Bellow and Philip Roth as influences. He studied writing at Brown University with John Hawkes and at Stanford University with Gilbert Sorrentino.

From 1999 to 2004, Eugenides, his wife and daughter lived in Berlin, where he was a fellow at the American University. The family now lives in Chicago.

Eugenides' reading will be followed by an onstage interview and a book sale and signing. Admission is $5, free for students and seniors. Doors open at 6:45 p.m. For information call 713-521-2026.

Monday, January 24, 2005

The town downtown

Jan. 23, 2005, 12:35AM
The town downtown
As city's center comes to life, newcomers — and old-timers — rediscover urban life
By DAVID THEISS
Copyright 2005 Houston Chronicle


Karen Warren / Chronicle
GATHERING PLACE: Cheryl Pierce surfs the Web, and Susie McMullan bonds with a cat in the Keystone Lofts apartment of Amanda Jones and Matt Reading, who relocated from Austin.


Brett Coomer / Chronicle
ART PARTY: Artist Ross Irwin, from left, Caryn Landauer, Thomas G. H. Dorsch and Nicola Parente, work on a project on the floor of Parente's downtown loft.


Brett Coomer / Chronicle
GARDEN SPOT: Pam Krischke waters her plants on her Hermann Lofts balcony.

I keep hearing people pay Houston's street scene the ultimate compliment: It makes you feel like you're someplace else — New York, Philadelphia, San Francisco, New Orleans. One thing we all agree on: Houston can't go back to the blahs. Street life for the masses is here to stay. Downtown is here to stay.

Now street life really only cranks up around 10:30 p.m. Thursday through Saturday. And the crowd might be mixed in race, but it isn't in age, or in its ideas of what makes for a good time. It's a little dispiriting, actually, to this boho of a certain age, to look at the clubs along Main and say, "This is our downtown? A place where young people can dance in old buildings?"

But when I start to brood about downtown's future, I wander into Kaveh Kanes coffee house. When I step in to find a very young-looking jazz quartet tearing through an original composition, and see the customers talking or listening or maybe even reading and, blessedly, none of them posing, I feel that I've entered a pocket of reality. The owner of the coffee house, Ben Fullelove, surprises me with the news that he and his family have moved downtown, into the Rice. It's temporary, while his house is being remodeled, but Fullelove is happy here. "It's weird," he says, "but downtown is the part of Houston that feels most like a small town. You keep running into people you know."

Soon, when I get my own chance to spend more time downtown, through the loan of a loft, I come to realize what Fullelove means about the area's small-townness. For all its apparent glitz, downtown may be the Houston neighborhood where you're most likely to not only know your neighbors but even knock on their door to borrow the proverbial cup of sugar.

I got to live the urban dream recently when my wife, son, dog and I crashed in the Hermann Lofts on Milam for three nights that turned into a week. We were having too much fun to go home. I set myself the challenge of going 72 hours without getting in a car. No sweat. I walked to ballet, baseball and movies. Hopping on the rail, we had the perfect Saturday morning, shopping at a farmers market and pancaking at the Breakfast Klub. The pooch even got her turn, with a rare unleashed run along the bayou. And yes, I did say, "I feel like I'm somewhere else."

But I was just a tourist.

Informal Survey

What's it like for the people who live downtown? The answers range from pretty good to pretty great. In my informal survey, the starriest-eyed residents tend to be the most recently arrived, especially two households that just moved from Austin. In these cases, the kindling wood of low expectations makes Houston and downtown both shine more brightly.

Amanda Jones and her boyfriend, Matt Reading, moved here when Jones was transferred last May. Unenthused about changing cities, the couple rented an apartment in the Keystone Lofts on Texas so they could be near Jones' downtown job while they looked for a permanent home. But they soon found themselves falling for downtown.

Jones even says those words that sound so strange to a Houstonian: "Houston is a lot better than Austin." It's clear, though, that when she says Houston, she means downtown. "You can walk everywhere, and there's so much to do. You have access to lots of interests, and there are lots of great people." Reading chimes in, "This can be your headline: Austinite pleasantly surprised by Houston."

The other pair of Austin refugees have an even better story. David and Pam Krischke are native Houstonians who moved away in the '70s. David was a college football coach, and when he quit in the mid-'80s, they opened a printing business in Austin. They did well enough that when they sold it a few years ago, they were able to retire young. But their rather vigorous idea of retirement meant they were free to spend their weeks working as substitute teachers in the public schools.

About a year ago, downtown real-estate agent Minnette Boesel sold them an apartment in the Hermann Lofts and a vision of the urban life. But they continued to teach during the week in Austin, returning to Houston for the weekends. I've heard of people arranging for their lives to run in the other direction, but to work in Austin and weekend in Houston — never.

But to the Krischkes, the arrangement wasn't so exotic. David says, "Austin's great if you're under 35 and want to go hear live music. But here you can do it all. You can hear music, or go to the theater or to major-league sports. And you can walk everywhere. It's safe. You see homeless people, but all they do is panhandle you. They're not going to hurt you."

Like everyone else I talked to, he does wish there were at least a small grocery store downtown.

They like it so much, they dropped the substitute-teaching gig and moved here full time. Or at least they had, until David said he needed yet another challenge and signed up to go to Iraq as a kind of morale coach for the troops. "Maybe I'm naïve, but I don't feel like I'll be in danger," he says. Pam, who is about to start a new downtown job herself, looks on her husband's Iraq adventure with apparent equanimity. "I'm not worried," she says.

'More European'

So, yes, downtown has attracted some remarkable newcomers, including artist Nicola Parente from Italy. He moved into the Bayou Lofts three years ago and uses his 900-square-foot apartment as both living space and studio.

To create a work space, he pushes his furniture against the walls and just throws dropcloths on the floor. He recently had his first sold-out one-man show, but he's most eager to talk about his artist collaborative, Inventive Art, in which he and three other artists meet in his apartment to work together on paintings. "It's not like the Bauhaus collaborations, where each painter only worked on one corner of the canvas. We actually paint over each others' strokes, so it's a true collaboration," Parente says.

Parente gets excited talking about making art and living downtown. "It feels more European," he says. "You're forced to walk on the street, and then you meet people." He also finds a downtown market for his work. His pieces hang in a couple of cafes, Blank Canvas and Franklin Street Coffee, and the 6 Degrees bar has commissioned a mural from him when it opens from its current remodeling. "It's a fantastic market here," Parente says. "And there are lots of good artists."

Some Disappointments

But living in the heart of Houston also has its disappointments, at least for Treebeards owners Dan Tidwell and Jamie Mize, who were early downtowners. In 1994, with three other people, they bought the small unnamed building next door to the Hermann Lofts, which the group converted into two large apartments and an office for Minnette Boesel's real-estate business.

"We'd been promoting urban redevelopment for so long that it was time for us to put our money where our mouth was," says Mize. They say they had been attending workshops on possible redevelopment since the '80s. "We've seen more charettes (artist renderings of architecture sketches) than we can remember." Mize recalls that when the Rice deal was announced in 1997, "We thought, 'We're on our way.' "

But things haven't changed as much as they'd like. "We're a little disappointed," says Tidwell. "We thought there would be more retail by now. More of everything, really."

Sure enough, almost no non-bar or non-restaurant retail has opened downtown. And no new housing has been built (though the Shamrock Towers project is supposed to break ground at Texas and Main any day now), and developers are nearly out of historical buildings to rehabilitate.

That points to downtown's crying need — affordable and middle-class housing. Reading is amazed at how cheap downtown Houston is. Renting and buying are about half of what they would cost in downtown Austin, but for most people, even those who crave an urban lifestyle, buying a $400,000 loft is out of the question. And until downtown's population rises dramatically — doubling, at least, to 10,000 — you won't find significant retail there.

"Why isn't there more housing that a nurse working in the Medical Center could afford?" asks urban broker Jeff Kaplan of Wulfe & Co. developers.

The answer is and isn't complicated. Simply put, the dirt is expensive. On the other hand, other cities with equally expensive dirt have found ways to build mixed-income housing. But Kaplan says that Houston hears "mixed-income" and understands "housing projects."

Stuck in the '70s?

In any case, Houston still has plenty of dirt downtown to redevelop. The area around the ballpark, to name just one parking-lot district, remains such a wasteland of surface lots that you expect to find T.S. Eliot taking up the parking at Astros games.

Many property owners cling to the notion that some developer will make them rich by building an office tower on their property. These owners are not being realistic, says Guy Hagstette of the Houston Downtown Management District. "They're stuck in the 1970s, when skyscrapers sprouted out of the Houston gumbo. But in the last 20 years, there have only been five new office buildings (downtown)," Hagstette says. "There will maybe be six lucky landowners whose lots are bought for high-rise development. The rest will either have to hang on to their parking lots or agree to sell for less than dream money. Then middle-class housing can be built."

But in the meantime, how can the city achieve this no-brainer of a goal? Realtors talk about the city's giving tax abatements to encourage developers to pay the asking price for the land. But Hagstette says, "City government has done a hell of a lot," referring to the massive public and private works projects that led up to the Super Bowl. How much more can we ask? He adds, "We (the Downtown Management District) are looking for every idea that doesn't involve public funds."

These ideas often involve corporate help. Maybe corporations that subsidize their employees' parking could take that same money and help employees pay for downtown housing. Maybe some corporations and the city could collaborate to build a public school downtown.

Early Stages

These specific ideas may or may not fly. But they point to Hagstette's main point vis-à-vis downtown. The redevelopment process is in its early stages, and the work to come will take just as much creativity and hard work as has the recent substantial progress. My biggest fear is that people are going to think that now that we have the rail and the hotels and the sports facilities, downtown will take care of itself. It won't.

Still, Hagstette says, he is optimistic. "It's just that this job has taught me to be patient. But the city is too good about responding to the market for (housing and retail development) not to happen."

So yes, the downtown that so many people want so badly is coming, but it will only unfold one block at a time, and the picture may not be complete for another 20 years. I'm happy that downtown is coming back, but I still share in the lament of Tidwell and Mize. We think downtown is going to happen. We're just afraid we're going to be too old to enjoy it.

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/headline/features/3002851

It All Depends What You Mean by 'Independent



January 23, 2005
It All Depends What You Mean by 'Independent'
By RICHARD RUSHFIELD

I SEE now what all the excitement is out here in Santa Monica," the actor Bill Murray said, accepting his 2004 Independent Spirit Award for best actor last February. "For a great number of the people in this room, this is as dressed up as you're going to get all year. And for an equally large number, this is as casually dressed as you're going to be all year."

Off-the-cuff as Mr. Murray's quip seemed to be - he joked that prepared remarks "wouldn't be independent" - it captured something about the Spirit awards, which have become the meeting-place for Hollywood's glamour crowd and low-budget, seat-of-your pants filmmakers. Twenty years after the nonprofit Independent Film Project (I.F.P.) started its low-key annual tribute to indie film, a then-neglected corner of the arts, the Spirits have grown into one of Hollywood's glitziest and quirkiest parties of the awards season. They continue to honor idiosyncratic films made on minuscule budgets - the trophy depicts a bird, representing the independent spirit, wrapped with shoestrings - but fringe filmmakers like Todd Haynes and Errol Morris now share the ceremony with people like Tom Cruise, Lucy Liu and Jennifer Aniston, who were among the awards presenters in 2004. And the show itself now has all the staples of a Hollywood gala: corporate sponsors, five-figure ticket prices, gift bags filled with expensive giveaways and a star-studded red carpet.

In a landscape crowded with televised awards shows, the Spirits, which will be broadcast starting at 5 p.m., Eastern time, on Feb. 26 (the day before the Academy Awards) on Bravo and IFC, has found a niche with a show full of spontaneous fumbling of the sort that the Academy Awards' producers work hard to avoid.

"We want it to feel onstage as though you're getting a glimpse at what's going on backstage," said Diana Zahn-Storey, who has produced the Spirits since 1995.

That let-it-all-hang-out tone was on display at the 2000 ceremony, when the actress Ally Sheedy gave an unhinged 10-minute acceptance speech, gushing about the resurrection of an aging actress in Hollywood and refusing to yield the podium.

The underground film director John Waters, host of the Spirits since 2001 before passing the baton to Samuel L. Jackson this year, described the show's ethos in an interview: "It doesn't have to appeal to mid-America. We're doing it for the niche audience that had seen all the movies, that were supporters of independent films. We don't have to pretend to cross over into an audience that wouldn't watch the show."

To that end, the show is peppered with tongue-in-cheek celebrations of independent film's more alienating qualities, illustrated by a bit performed at the 2002 show by the actors Rachel Griffiths and Alan Cumming; it deplored the small number of people who had sex after watching indie movies like "Donnie Darko" compared with how many had it after going to films like, say, "The Mummy."

But while the Spirit awards have grown into a Hollywood institution, as recently as a decade ago they occupied an obscure corner of the entertainment industry, as did the independent film sector as a whole.

"It was lunchtime" and everyone was getting drunk, Bingham Ray, the former president of the indie powerhouse October Films, recalled of the early gatherings. The producer Christine Vachon ("Far From Heaven"), a Spirits regular since 1990, remembered a chummy get-together where, she said, "everybody drank too much, and there was no press there, so nobody watched what they said."

When Dawn Hudson, a vivacious Arkansas native and former actress and screenwriter, took over as executive director of the I.F.P.'s struggling Los Angeles chapter in 1991, she found herself at the helm of a ceremony more notable for its intoxicated languor than for its glitz or clout. The 1991 show, she recalled, ran four and a half hours and featured a 45-minute keynote address by Francis Ford Coppola. Built around an analogy comparing filmmaking and wine-making, the speech seemed to touch on each and every phase of a vintner's work.

The next day, Ms. Hudson was taken to task over lunch by Kenneth Turan, film critic for The Los Angeles Times, who said that the out-of-control show wasted an opportunity to build support for the organization's independent film services. "You start out with all the good will in the room and you burn it up by the time we leave," she said he told her.

Ms. Hudson, the head of a two-person organization kept afloat by promissory notes from its board members, needed to rein in a show created to celebrate eccentricity and individuality. Over the next few years, the Spirits cut the time-devouring keynote address and pepped up the proceedings with snappy film clips, while trying to preserve space for the sort of gaffes and rhetorical over-reaching that gave the show its atmosphere of indie-world spontaneity. Bleeped-out swear words, for instance, are still common and, Ms. Storey says, presenters are encouraged to ignore the scripts provided them and fumble freely.

The most immediate beneficiary of the show's growth has been the I.F.P., which uses the ceremony as a fund-raiser. Tables cost $10,000 to $40,000 and, Ms. Hudson says, there is an extensive waiting list to buy one, as a presence at the Spirits has become de rigueur for Hollywood's major players. As John Waters described a recent crowd, "Every person who could ever let me make a movie was in that one room."

Overall, the Spirits generate $1.5 million for the I.F.P.'s Los Angeles chapter, a quarter of its $6 million budget (up from a $350,000 budget in 1991). As a result, I.F.P./L.A. is now well past its days of dodging creditors, offering an array of film production and distribution services to the 6,000 members who join for a $90 annual fee.

The I.F.P. also functions as an advocate for independent film. In 2003, when the Academy of Motion Pictures tried to ban the distribution of screeners - privately circulated DVD's of Oscar candidate films - a move many thought would hurt less visible films, the I.F.P. led the lawsuit that forced the academy to back down.

With the Spirits' success, however, has come concern that they no longer serve a beleaguered corner of the entertainment marketplace. Peter Biskind, whose book "Down and Dirty Pictures: Miramax, Sundance and the Rise of Independent Film" (Simon & Schuster, 2004) chronicles the independent film world of the 1990's, said in an interview: "It's pretty clear that the Spirit awards, as they become more and more sophisticated and have gotten more and more attention, have paralleled the Hollywoodization of indie films. I don't think there's anything wrong with the ceremony per se, but they have become mini-Oscars. And that's appropriate, because that's the direction that indie films have gone in anyways."

Much of the grumbling about the Hollywoodization of the Spirits centers on the awards' rather fluid nominating criteria. At first, films were deemed independent based on their sources of financing and had to prove, essentially, that they were free from the taint of studio backing. By the mid-1990's, however, as major studios became interested in financing low-budget films, and independent distributors like October Films and Miramax were bought up by major studios, verifying the fiscal independence of films became increasingly difficult, Ms. Hudson said. "It became kind of ludicrous," she explained. "We had become the financing police to find where money came from."

In 1995, the I.F.P./Los Angeles board scrapped the rigorous formula, replacing it with four criteria: "Original provocative subject matter, uniqueness of vision, economy of means and percentage of independent financing." These serve as rough guidelines that the nominating committee, a group of 15 independent film professionals, use to make their decisions.

If a film falls short on one or more of these, though, the judges are free to overlook it. For instance, this year's committee set a budget cap in the $15 million range, but "Sideways," the film receiving the most nominations, exceeded that total with a budget estimated at $17.5 million.

Decisions like these, Ms. Hudson says, arise out of the committee's grappling for a definition of what independent film really is.

"There's a lot of discussion about the subject matter," she said. "The feeling about 'Sideways' was it was so independent in its vision, the fact that it has a slightly higher budget still warranted including it."

In addition to "Sideways," the 2004 best feature nominees include two relatively high-exposure films - "Kinsey" and "Maria Full of Grace" - as well as "Primer" and "Baadasssss!," whose combined box office tally is less than $1 million.

Once the nominees are chosen, voting is open to the entire I.F.P. membership, whose past choices have provoked further grumbling from some indie filmmakers. Since 1994, an analysis of box-office figures reveals, the best feature award has been won by the highest-grossing nominee, a pattern that will continue this year if the favorite, "Sideways," wins.

Ms. Hudson conceded, "It's never really a level playing field when you have tons of marketing dollars being spent on some of the films and very few marketing dollars spent on others, and you have some films that are in the theaters for a long time and others that are in and out."

But, she said, the I.F.P. was trying to even things up through a new arrangement with Netflix, the DVD-by-mail service, to lend copies of nominated films to I.F.P. members.

Sardonic, quirky and low budget though the Independent Spirit Awards may be, the show has become a part of the annual awards industry, and with that comes accompanying baggage.

"It isn't anxiety free anymore," Mr. Waters said. "People want to win just as much as they want to win the Oscar." In independent film, "people have to pretend a little bit that they don't care," he continued. "But everybody cares. Or else it wouldn't be important.

The Crafty Attacks on Evolution

January 23, 2005
EDITORIAL
The Crafty Attacks on Evolution

Critics of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution become more wily with each passing year. Creationists who believe that God made the world and everything in it pretty much as described in the Bible were frustrated when their efforts to ban the teaching of evolution in the public schools or inject the teaching of creationism were judged unconstitutional by the courts. But over the past decade or more a new generation of critics has emerged with a softer, more roundabout approach that they hope can pass constitutional muster.

One line of attack - on display in Cobb County, Ga., in recent weeks - is to discredit evolution as little more than a theory that is open to question. Another strategy - now playing out in Dover, Pa. - is to make students aware of an alternative theory called "intelligent design," which infers the existence of an intelligent agent without any specific reference to God. These new approaches may seem harmless to a casual observer, but they still constitute an improper effort by religious advocates to impose their own slant on the teaching of evolution.


The Cobb County fight centers on a sticker that the board inserted into a new biology textbook to placate opponents of evolution. The school board, to its credit, was trying to strengthen the teaching of evolution after years in which it banned study of human origins in the elementary and middle schools and sidelined the topic as an elective in high school, in apparent violation of state curriculum standards. When the new course of study raised hackles among parents and citizens (more than 2,300 signed a petition), the board sought to quiet the controversy by placing a three-sentence sticker in the textbooks:

"This textbook contains material on evolution. Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully, and critically considered."

Although the board clearly thought this was a reasonable compromise, and many readers might think it unexceptional, it is actually an insidious effort to undermine the science curriculum. The first sentence sounds like a warning to parents that the film they are about to watch with their children contains pornography. Evolution is so awful that the reader must be warned that it is discussed inside the textbook. The second sentence makes it sound as though evolution is little more than a hunch, the popular understanding of the word "theory," whereas theories in science are carefully constructed frameworks for understanding a vast array of facts. The National Academy of Sciences, the nation's most prestigious scientific organization, has declared evolution "one of the strongest and most useful scientific theories we have" and says it is supported by an overwhelming scientific consensus.

The third sentence, urging that evolution be studied carefully and critically, seems like a fine idea. The only problem is, it singles out evolution as the only subject so shaky it needs critical judgment. Every subject in the curriculum should be studied carefully and critically. Indeed, the interpretations taught in history, economics, sociology, political science, literature and other fields of study are far less grounded in fact and professional consensus than is evolutionary biology.

A more honest sticker would describe evolution as the dominant theory in the field and an extremely fruitful scientific tool. The sad fact is, the school board, in its zeal to be accommodating, swallowed the language of the anti-evolution crowd. Although the sticker makes no mention of religion and the school board as a whole was not trying to advance religion, a federal judge in Georgia ruled that the sticker amounted to an unconstitutional endorsement of religion because it was rooted in long-running religious challenges to evolution. In particular, the sticker's assertion that "evolution is a theory, not a fact" adopted the latest tactical language used by anti-evolutionists to dilute Darwinism, thereby putting the school board on the side of religious critics of evolution. That court decision is being appealed. Supporters of sound science education can only hope that the courts, and school districts, find a way to repel this latest assault on the most well-grounded theory in modern biology.


In the Pennsylvania case, the school board went further and became the first in the nation to require, albeit somewhat circuitously, that attention be paid in school to "intelligent design." This is the notion that some things in nature, such as the workings of the cell and intricate organs like the eye, are so complex that they could not have developed gradually through the force of Darwinian natural selection acting on genetic variations. Instead, it is argued, they must have been designed by some sort of higher intelligence. Leading expositors of intelligent design accept that the theory of evolution can explain what they consider small changes in a species over time, but they infer a designer's hand at work in what they consider big evolutionary jumps.

The Dover Area School District in Pennsylvania became the first in the country to place intelligent design before its students, albeit mostly one step removed from the classroom. Last week school administrators read a brief statement to ninth-grade biology classes (the teachers refused to do it) asserting that evolution was a theory, not a fact, that it had gaps for which there was no evidence, that intelligent design was a differing explanation of the origin of life, and that a book on intelligent design was available for interested students, who were, of course, encouraged to keep an open mind. That policy, which is being challenged in the courts, suffers from some of the same defects found in the Georgia sticker. It denigrates evolution as a theory, not a fact, and adds weight to that message by having administrators deliver it aloud.


Districts around the country are pondering whether to inject intelligent design into science classes, and the constitutional problems are underscored by practical issues. There is little enough time to discuss mainstream evolution in most schools; the Dover students get two 90-minute classes devoted to the subject. Before installing intelligent design in the already jam-packed science curriculum, school boards and citizens need to be aware that it is not a recognized field of science. There is no body of research to support its claims nor even a real plan to conduct such research. In 2002, more than a decade after the movement began, a pioneer of intelligent design lamented that the movement had many sympathizers but few research workers, no biology texts and no sustained curriculum to offer educators. Another leading expositor told a Christian magazine last year that the field had no theory of biological design to guide research, just "a bag of powerful intuitions, and a handful of notions." If evolution is derided as "only a theory," intelligent design needs to be recognized as "not even a theory" or "not yet a theory." It should not be taught or even described as a scientific alternative to one of the crowning theories of modern science.

That said, in districts where evolution is a burning issue, there ought to be some place in school where the religious and cultural criticisms of evolution can be discussed, perhaps in a comparative religion class or a history or current events course. But school boards need to recognize that neither creationism nor intelligent design is an alternative to Darwinism as a scientific explanation of the evolution of life.

Sunday, January 23, 2005

Sex Ed at Harvard

January 23, 2005
OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR
Sex Ed at Harvard
By CHARLES MURRAY

Washington

FORTY-SIX years ago, in "The Two Cultures," C. P. Snow famously warned of the dangers when communication breaks down between the sciences and the humanities. The reaction to remarks by Lawrence Summers, the president of Harvard, about the differences between men and women was yet another sign of a breakdown that takes Snow's worries to a new level: the wholesale denial that certain bodies of scientific knowledge exist.

Mr. Summers's comments, at a supposedly off-the-record gathering, were mild. He offered, as an interesting though unproved possibility, that innate sex differences might explain why so few women are on science and engineering faculties, and he told a story about how nature seemed to trump nurture in his own daughter.

To judge from the subsequent furor, one might conclude that Mr. Summers was advancing a radical idea backed only by personal anecdotes and a fringe of cranks. In truth, it's the other way around. If you were to query all the scholars who deal professionally with data about the cognitive repertoires of men and women, all but a fringe would accept that the sexes are different, and that genes are clearly implicated.

How our genetic makeup is implicated remains largely unknown, but our geneticists and neuroscientists are doing a great deal of work to unravel the story. When David C. Geary's landmark book "Male, Female: The Evolution of Human Sex Differences" was published in 1998, the bibliography of technical articles ran to 52 pages - and that was seven years ago. Hundreds if not thousands of articles have been published since.

This scholarship shows a notable imbalance, however: scholarship on the environmental sources of male-female differences tends to be stale (wade through a recent assessment of 172 studies of gender differences in parenting involving 28,000 children, and you will discover that two-thirds of the boys were discouraged from playing with dolls - but were nurtured pretty much the same as girls in every other way); but scholarship about innate male-female differences has the vibrancy and excitement of an important new field gaining momentum. A recent notable example is "The Essential Difference," published in 2003 by Simon Baron-Cohen of Cambridge University, which presents a grand unified theory of male and female cognition that may well be a historic breakthrough.

"Exciting" is the right word for this work, not "threatening" or "scary." We may not know the answers yet, but we can be confident that they will be more interesting than, say, a discrete gene for science that clicks on for men differently than it does for women. Rather, it will be a story of the interaction of many male and female genetic differences, and the way a person's environment affects those differences. Hardly any of the answers will lend themselves to simplistic verdicts of "males are better" or vice versa. For every time there is such a finding favoring males, there will be another favoring females.

Some people will find the results threatening - because some people find any group differences threatening - but such fears will be misplaced. We may find that innate differences give men, as a group, an edge over women, as a group, in producing, say, terrific mathematicians. But knowing that fact about the group difference will not change another fact: that some women are terrific mathematicians. The proportions of men and women mathematicians may never be equal, but who cares? What's important is that all women with the potential to become terrific mathematicians have full opportunity to do so.

Of course, new knowledge will not be without costs. Perhaps knowing that there is a group difference will discourage some women from even trying to become mathematicians or engineers or circus clowns. We - scientists, parents, educators, employers - must do everything we can to prevent such unwarranted reactions. And the best way to do that is to put the individual's abilities, not group membership, at the center of our attention.

Against the cost of the new knowledge is the far greater cost of obliviousness, which can lead us to pursue policies that try to make society conform to expectations that conflict with what human beings really are. In the study of gender, large and growing bodies of good science are helping us understand the sources of human abilities and limitations. It is time to accept their existence, their seriousness and their legitimacy.

Charles Murray is a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.

Different but (Probably) Equal

January 23, 2005
OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR
Different but (Probably) Equal
By OLIVIA JUDSON

London — HYPOTHESIS: males and females are typically indistinguishable on the basis of their behaviors and intellectual abilities.

This is not true for elephants. Females have big vocabularies and hang out in herds; males tend to live in solitary splendor, and insofar as they speak at all, their conversation appears mostly to consist of elephant for "I'm in the mood, I'm in the mood..."

The hypothesis is not true for zebra finches. Males sing elaborate songs. Females can't sing at all. A zebra finch opera would have to have males in all the singing roles.

And it's not true for green spoon worms. This animal, which lives on the sea floor, has one of the largest known size differences between male and female: the male is 200,000 times smaller. He spends his whole life in her reproductive tract, fertilizing eggs by regurgitating sperm through his mouth. He's so different from his mate that when he was first discovered by science, he was not recognized as being a green spoon worm; instead, he was thought to be a parasite.

Is it ridiculous to suppose that the hypothesis might not be true for humans either?

No. But it is not fashionable - as Lawrence Summers, president of Harvard University, discovered when he suggested this month that greater intrinsic ability might be one reason that men are overrepresented at the top levels of fields involving math, science and engineering.

There are - as the maladroit Mr. Summers should have known - good reasons it's not fashionable. Beliefs that men are intrinsically better at this or that have repeatedly led to discrimination and prejudice, and then they've been proved to be nonsense. Women were thought not to be world-class musicians. But when American symphony orchestras introduced blind auditions in the 1970's - the musician plays behind a screen so that his or her gender is invisible to those listening - the number of women offered jobs in professional orchestras increased.

Similarly, in science, studies of the ways that grant applications are evaluated have shown that women are more likely to get financing when those reading the applications do not know the sex of the applicant. In other words, there's still plenty of work to do to level the playing field; there's no reason to suppose there's something inevitable about the status quo.

All the same, it seems a shame if we can't even voice the question. Sex differences are fascinating - and entirely unlike the other biological differences that distinguish other groups of living things (like populations and species). Sex differences never arise in isolation, with females evolving on a mountaintop, say, and males evolving in a cave. Instead, most genes - and in some species, all genes - spend equal time in each sex. Many sex differences are not, therefore, the result of his having one gene while she has another. Rather, they are attributable to the way particular genes behave when they find themselves in him instead of her.

The magnificent difference between male and female green spoon worms, for example, has nothing to do with their having different genes: each green spoon worm larva could go either way. Which sex it becomes depends on whether it meets a female during its first three weeks of life. If it meets a female, it becomes male and prepares to regurgitate; if it doesn't, it becomes female and settles into a crack on the sea floor.

What's more, the fact that most genes occur in both males and females can generate interesting sexual tensions. In male fruit flies, for instance, variants of genes that confer particular success - which on Mother Nature's abacus is the number of descendants you have - tend to be detrimental when they occur in females, and vice versa. Worse: the bigger the advantage in one sex, the more detrimental those genes are in the other. This means that, at least for fruit flies, the same genes that make a male a Don Juan would also turn a female into a wallflower; conversely, the genes that make a female a knockout babe would produce a clumsy fellow with the sex appeal of a cake tin.

But why do sex differences appear at all? They appear when the secret of success differs for males and females: the more divergent the paths to success, the more extreme the physiological differences. Peacocks have huge tails and strut about because peahens prefer males with big tails. Bull elephant seals grow to five times the mass of females because big males are better at monopolizing the beaches where the females haul out to have sex and give birth.

Meanwhile, the crow-like jackdaw has (as far as we can tell) no obvious sex differences and appears to lead a life of devoted monogamy. Here, what works for him also seems to work for her, though the female is more likely to sit on the eggs. So by studying the differences - and similarities - among men and women, we can potentially learn about the forces that have shaped us in the past.

And I think the news is good. We're not like green spoon worms or elephant seals, with males and females so different that aspiring to an egalitarian society would be ludicrous. And though we may not be jackdaws either - men and women tend to look different, though even here there's overlap - it's obvious that where there are intellectual differences, they are so slight they cannot be prejudged.

The interesting questions are, is there an average intrinsic difference? And how extensive is the variation? I would love to know if the averages are the same but the underlying variation is different - with members of one sex tending to be either superb or dreadful at particular sorts of thinking while members of the other are pretty good but rarely exceptional.

Curiously, such a result could arise even if the forces shaping men and women have been identical. In some animals - humans and fruit flies come to mind - males have an X chromosome and a Y chromosome while females have two X's. In females, then, extreme effects of genes on one X chromosome can be offset by the genes on the other. But in males, there's no hiding your X. In birds and butterflies, though, it's the other way around: females have a Z chromosome and a W chromosome, and males snooze along with two Z's.

The science of sex differences, even in fruit flies and toads, is a ferociously complex subject. It's also famously fraught, given its malignant history. In fact, there was a time not so long ago when I would have balked at the whole enterprise: the idea there might be intrinsic cognitive differences between men and women was one I found insulting. But science is a great persuader. The jackdaws and spoon worms have forced me to change my mind. Now I'm keen to know what sets men and women apart - and no longer afraid of what we may find.

Olivia Judson, an evolutionary biologist at Imperial College in London, is the author of "Dr. Tatiana's Sex Advice to All Creation: The Definitive Guide to the Evolutionary Biology of Sex."

A Bunch of Krabby Patties



January 23, 2005
OP-ED COLUMNIST
A Bunch of Krabby Patties
By MAUREEN DOWD

I should have known.

I can't believe I thought he was just an innocent little sponge wearing tight shorts.

What in the name of Davy Jones's locker would a sponge be doing holding hands with a starfish or donning purple and hot-pink flowered garb to redecorate the Krusty Krab if he weren't a perverted invertebrate?

Before this is over, we're going to find out that SpongeBob is the illicit spawn of the Tampa shock jock Bubba the Love Sponge. Who knew SpongeBob would become as fraught as the cover of "Abbey Road"?

It took Dr. James Dobson, the conservative Christian leader and gay marriage opponent, who claims the president's re-election was more a mandate for his ideas than George Bush's, to point out the insidious underside of the popular cartoon character SpongeBob SquarePants. It takes a sponge to brainwash a child.

Holy Abe! Dr. Dobson outed SpongeBob at a black-tie inaugural fete last week for members of Congress and political allies. He said that a "pro-homosexual video" - starring SpongeBob, Barney, Jimmy Neutron, Winnie the Pooh, Kermit the Frog and Miss Piggy - was set to go to elementary schools to promote a "tolerance pledge," including tolerance for differences of "sexual identity."

Hoppin' clams, as they say in Bikini Bottom, the den of epicene iniquity where SpongeBob lives. Nothing good can come of tolerance.

Dan Martinsen, a spokesman for Nickelodeon, where SpongeBob beats the pants off the competition, was flummoxed: "It's a sponge, for crying out loud. He has no sexuality."

Dr. Dobson has done the country a service by reminding us to watch out for the dark side of lovable but malleable sponges. He inspired me to fish through the president's Inaugural Address with a more skeptical eye.

Mr. Bush's epic pledge to support democratic movements and institutions in every nation and to end "tyranny in our world" may seem wildly pie-in-the-sky, given that the Iraq vortex has drained our military.

Although his incendiary speech about "the untamed fire of freedom" has been widely interpreted as a code-red warning to both foes and friends, I wonder if the president knew he was literally promising to stamp out undemocratic governments across the globe, which would include some of our top allies. He probably thought it was a fancier way of repackaging the Iraq invasion, not as a failed search for W.M.D., but as a blow for freedom (a word used 27 times) and liberty (used 15 times).

I wonder if W. is surprised that people took it literally. The Bushes don't always understand that they're being held to their rhetoric in major speeches. (Read my warships.) For such a brass-knuckled vision, the president's delivery was curiously unemotional.

Some of the same advisers who filled Mr. Bush's brain with sugary visions of a quick and painless Iraq makeover did mean the speech to be literal; they are drawing up military options for the rest of the Middle East. Once again, the lovable and malleable president seems to be soaking up the martial mind-set of those around him, almost like ... a sponge.

SpongeBush SquarePants!

We can only hope that Dr. Dobson doesn't pick up on the resemblance. SpongeBob, as his song goes, "lives in a pineapple under the sea/absorbent and yellow and porous is he!" SpongeBush lives in a bubble in D.C./absorbent and shallow and porous is he!

SpongeBush ensnared the country in a whale of a mess in Iraq because he guilelessly absorbed the neocons' dire warnings about Saddam's weapons capabilities and their rosy assumptions about Ahmad Chalabi's leadership capabilities.

Dick Cheney is a gruff Mr. Krabs taskmaster to SpongeBush, but SpongeBush is crazy about him anyhow. W. trustingly let his vice president make the worst-case scenario about Iraq a first-case scenario.

Mr. Bush might have thought he was just blowing pretty bubbles full of lofty ideals about freedom and liberty in his speech, but Mr. Cheney and the neocons seem intent on filleting Iran and Syria. (Doesn't Richard Perle remind you of the snarky and pretentious next-door neighbor to SpongeBob, Squidward Tentacles?)

The vice president told Don Imus that Iran was "right at the top of the list" of trouble spots, and that Israel "might well decide to act first" with a military strike.

Even if he's a little light in the flippers, SpongeBob has brought children good, clean fun. SpongeBush has brought the world dark, endless fights.




Friday, January 21, 2005

Today's News





Newspaper Film Reviews



January 21, 2005
MOVIE REVIEW | 'HEAD-ON'
Two Misplaced Souls Decide They Might as Well Live
By MANOHLA DARGIS




Birol Unel and his bride, Sibel Kekilli, in "Head-On," a German film set among immigrants in the gritty reaches of working-class Hamburg.


Jan. 21, 2005, 11:09AM
'Sideways' puts vino in cinematic spotlight
By MICHAEL LONSFORD
Copyright 2005 Houston Chronicle




Jan. 20, 2005, 6:26PM
Fear and Trembling is light and intense
By A.O. SCOTT
New York Times




The Cinema Guild
Amelie (Sylvie Testud) serves tea in Fear and Trembling.



Gay And Lesbian News


If We Crash -- I Will Survive!
Gay guys and lesbian gals like to go down, but they'll be going up -- in style! -- if Houstonian Guy Felder has his way. He and a friend are starting an air charter service called Fabulair, which aims to be to gays what HootersAir is to pathetic businessmen.

The idea started out as an e-mail spoof, but Felder (VP of marketing and officer of On-the-Ground Fabulousness) became convinced it could really work.

"We want to have the perception of a fun airline," says the 26-year-old University of Houston student. "We're not intending to fly bordellos…Our flights are not going to be sex orgies; there will be no drugs, none of that."

There will be drag-queen fashion shows, mid-flight seat switches and movies like Mommie Dearest. (Gee, couldn't they have named the thing Stereotype Airlines?)

Details are still being worked out -- which is entrepreneur-speak for "Believe it when you see it" -- but Felder hopes to start offering flights by August.

"We want to make getting there half the fun," he says.

You are now free to move about the cabin…girlfriend!

Jan. 21, 2005, 10:41AM
Video with SpongeBob alarms Christian group
Reuters News Service





    Chronicle file
    SpongeBob SquarePants in his Nickelodeon Channel television show.
  • Article





Houston News


January 21, 2005
Moving In on New York Laps
By MICHAEL BRICK



  • Article




  • Nicole Bengiveno/The New York Times
    Eric S. Langan, a Texan who owns the Rick's Cabaret chain, has bought the Paradise Club in Manhattan.



    David J. Phillips/Associated Press
    A dancer at Rick's in Houston, where hospitality is stressed.




January 21, 2005
Clemens to Become Highest Paid Pitcher Ever
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS







Computers


January 20, 2005
STATE OF THE ART
New Ways to Manage Your Photos
By DAVID POGUE





    Correction - Tools in the free program Picasa 2 from Google for Windows 98 and later include a button called "I'm Feeling Lucky."



    Transformed - IPhoto 5 is part of Apple's iLife '05 suite ($80; free with every new Mac). It displays changes on the photo, in real time.

  • Article



When Bloggers Make News
As Their Clout Increases,
Web Diarists Are Asking:
Just What Are the Rules?

By JESSICA MINTZ
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
January 21, 2005; Page B1






online
Online Casinos hits.